8-2
Moderator: GlendoraRam
- NorCal RF
- VIP Member

- Posts: 7558
- Joined: October 26th, 2016, 12:11 pm
- Has thanked: 63 times
- Been thanked: 430 times
8-2
Two huge wins last 2 weeks. Huge…….
Anyone ripping the offense is not giving Seattle’s D the credit they deserve. They are damn good……..
We did see that against a really good defensive front our OL is a bit of an issue……..
We were reminded again Havs can’t handle elite speed rushers………
Games like this Kyren needs to be THE RB……….
D bent didn’t break. We are not a fan of it but again a huge win………
4 TO to 1 TO. Big games that is usually the difference. Secondary got it done when they needed to……..
On to Tampa Bay. Another big game………
Division won’t be decided IMO until mid to late December…….
Rams KO scheme is again BS……..
Rams have a heck of a punter…….
Offense yes is missing Atwell a bit. Or someone who can stretch the field…….
Anyone ripping the offense is not giving Seattle’s D the credit they deserve. They are damn good……..
We did see that against a really good defensive front our OL is a bit of an issue……..
We were reminded again Havs can’t handle elite speed rushers………
Games like this Kyren needs to be THE RB……….
D bent didn’t break. We are not a fan of it but again a huge win………
4 TO to 1 TO. Big games that is usually the difference. Secondary got it done when they needed to……..
On to Tampa Bay. Another big game………
Division won’t be decided IMO until mid to late December…….
Rams KO scheme is again BS……..
Rams have a heck of a punter…….
Offense yes is missing Atwell a bit. Or someone who can stretch the field…….
Please Login or Become a VIP Member to Remove Advertisment
- RAMFAN71
- Hall of Fame Member

- Posts: 2719
- Joined: October 23rd, 2018, 8:14 am
- Has thanked: 44 times
- Been thanked: 95 times
Re: 8-2
Did we not use the 13 man today as much? At all? Not televised here, so trying to get what happened. Just wondering if coach tried to get cute and not show that 13 man to try and catch them unprepared.
"60% OF THE TIME........IT WORKS EVERY TIME"
Please Login or Become a VIP Member to Remove Advertisment
- DelMar
- VIP Member

- Posts: 7085
- Joined: January 31st, 2023, 11:01 am
- Has thanked: 1049 times
- Been thanked: 644 times
Re: 8-2
Best believe the Buccaneers are gonna be very hungry. Come Sunday night after their loss today….
Please Login or Become a VIP Member to Remove Advertisment
- NorCal RF
- VIP Member

- Posts: 7558
- Joined: October 26th, 2016, 12:11 pm
- Has thanked: 63 times
- Been thanked: 430 times
Re: 8-2
We did. But Seattle had it well schemed. Their D is damn good. JMO we should have ran a bit more with Kyren today once they were handling our 13 lineup. We did run but as much with Corum and IMO Corum did not have a good game. I would have gone with just Kyren in the second half. Again each week is different…….
Please Login or Become a VIP Member to Remove Advertisment
Re: 8-2
I got to agree with most all the points here. We need to figure our kickoff off instead of giving teams shorter fields.
Defense overall was great. Offense needs better more aggressive play calling but with more protection on pass plays needs to be addressed imo.
To me it was a 50/50 ending which shouldn't have happened they started the last drive on the one foot line.
One defensive point is we need get QBs off their spot better. There was pressures today but not much this is the third week in a row.
Defense overall was great. Offense needs better more aggressive play calling but with more protection on pass plays needs to be addressed imo.
To me it was a 50/50 ending which shouldn't have happened they started the last drive on the one foot line.
One defensive point is we need get QBs off their spot better. There was pressures today but not much this is the third week in a row.
Please Login or Become a VIP Member to Remove Advertisment
Please Login or Become a VIP Member to Remove Advertisment
- therealheadslap75
- VIP Member

- Posts: 2033
- Joined: February 1st, 2015, 8:35 am
- Has thanked: 45 times
- Been thanked: 84 times
Re: 8-2
my problem with this is they didn't beat us physically, we came out in the first quarter and stomped on them, then we allowed them to dictate a change in tactics.
Seattle has a good front seven and they have a good back end, which is why we needed to distribute the ball more, other than the Parkinson's touchdown he stopped throwing through the tight ends after the first quarter
Stafford had a bad game all the way around
Sometimes you have to get it to your first receiver quick and your coach needs to scheme them the fuck open
I think the rollout play is getting figured out, maybe we need to run a fake rollout play
Seattle has a good front seven and they have a good back end, which is why we needed to distribute the ball more, other than the Parkinson's touchdown he stopped throwing through the tight ends after the first quarter
Stafford had a bad game all the way around
Sometimes you have to get it to your first receiver quick and your coach needs to scheme them the fuck open
I think the rollout play is getting figured out, maybe we need to run a fake rollout play
Please Login or Become a VIP Member to Remove Advertisment
- RAMFAN71
- Hall of Fame Member

- Posts: 2719
- Joined: October 23rd, 2018, 8:14 am
- Has thanked: 44 times
- Been thanked: 95 times
Re: 8-2
I did see Havs just whiff on speed rushes. He may need to be our backup. And zero from Ferguson. Back to 8 targets each to puka/Adam's.
"60% OF THE TIME........IT WORKS EVERY TIME"
Please Login or Become a VIP Member to Remove Advertisment
- NorCal RF
- VIP Member

- Posts: 7558
- Joined: October 26th, 2016, 12:11 pm
- Has thanked: 63 times
- Been thanked: 430 times
Re: 8-2
therealheadslap75 wrote: ↑November 16th, 2025, 4:40 pm my problem with this is they didn't beat us physically, we came out in the first quarter and stomped on them, then we allowed them to dictate a change in tactics.
Seattle has a good front seven and they have a good back end, which is why we needed to distribute the ball more, other than the Parkinson's touchdown he stopped throwing through the tight ends after the first quarter
Stafford had a bad game all the way around
Sometimes you have to get it to your first receiver quick and your coach needs to scheme them the fuck open
I think the rollout play is getting figured out, maybe we need to run a fake rollout play
You, not saying you, can’t down play how good Seattle’s D is. They make a lot of offenses look bad………
Bottom line even with Seattle’s D playing great we managed 3 TD’s to their one. Short field or not they got it into the EZ to win……….
Please Login or Become a VIP Member to Remove Advertisment
- Truth
- Hall of Fame Member

- Posts: 2023
- Joined: December 23rd, 2019, 8:55 pm
- Has thanked: 16 times
- Been thanked: 71 times
Re: 8-2
I think the main reason Rams are 8-2 is Stafford is playing at a high level (you could argue it’s the best of his career given the stats) and the Rams lead the league in fewest penalties.
So if you have good Qb play and don’t beat yourselves with stupid penalties, you should keep winning games.
I think we are in a better spot this year than last year. I know most of the guys are the same but just feels were a little better. I don’t think we’re good enough to just dominate other good teams, but I think the Rams are good enough to win close games playing mistake free football against other good teams. I don’t see the gap in physicality in say the Eagles/Rams this year that I felt last year. And there’s no other teams in the NFC that are playing lights out football either.
It wouldn’t surprise me to see the Rams be the slight favorites now to get to the Super Bowl
So if you have good Qb play and don’t beat yourselves with stupid penalties, you should keep winning games.
I think we are in a better spot this year than last year. I know most of the guys are the same but just feels were a little better. I don’t think we’re good enough to just dominate other good teams, but I think the Rams are good enough to win close games playing mistake free football against other good teams. I don’t see the gap in physicality in say the Eagles/Rams this year that I felt last year. And there’s no other teams in the NFC that are playing lights out football either.
It wouldn’t surprise me to see the Rams be the slight favorites now to get to the Super Bowl
Please Login or Become a VIP Member to Remove Advertisment
- ocram23
- Hall of Fame Member

- Posts: 11051
- Joined: October 15th, 2019, 6:12 pm
- Has thanked: 123 times
- Been thanked: 315 times
Re: 8-2
yes their D is solid but I am not going to sit here and say the game plan today was good. Corum sucks....yes I said it he sucks. He is so tiny out there. Put in Hunter.NorCal RF wrote: ↑November 16th, 2025, 5:48 pmtherealheadslap75 wrote: ↑November 16th, 2025, 4:40 pm my problem with this is they didn't beat us physically, we came out in the first quarter and stomped on them, then we allowed them to dictate a change in tactics.
Seattle has a good front seven and they have a good back end, which is why we needed to distribute the ball more, other than the Parkinson's touchdown he stopped throwing through the tight ends after the first quarter
Stafford had a bad game all the way around
Sometimes you have to get it to your first receiver quick and your coach needs to scheme them the fuck open
I think the rollout play is getting figured out, maybe we need to run a fake rollout play
You, not saying you, can’t down play how good Seattle’s D is. They make a lot of offenses look bad………
Bottom line even with Seattle’s D playing great we managed 3 TD’s to their one. Short field or not they got it into the EZ to win……….
Running straight up the middle with Corum is just bad play calling. KW is so much better. Running 3 straight times up the middle with a midget on the goal line is unacceptable..JMO
Please Login or Become a VIP Member to Remove Advertisment
- brasilrams
- VIP Member

- Posts: 5679
- Joined: January 6th, 2018, 5:29 pm
- Has thanked: 527 times
- Been thanked: 191 times
Re: 8-2
Funny because before the season you were saying Stafford is old and he sucks. LolTruth wrote: ↑November 16th, 2025, 6:04 pm I think the main reason Rams are 8-2 is Stafford is playing at a high level (you could argue it’s the best of his career given the stats) and the Rams lead the league in fewest penalties.
So if you have good Qb play and don’t beat yourselves with stupid penalties, you should keep winning games.
I think we are in a better spot this year than last year. I know most of the guys are the same but just feels were a little better. I don’t think we’re good enough to just dominate other good teams, but I think the Rams are good enough to win close games playing mistake free football against other good teams. I don’t see the gap in physicality in say the Eagles/Rams this year that I felt last year. And there’s no other teams in the NFC that are playing lights out football either.
It wouldn’t surprise me to see the Rams be the slight favorites now to get to the Super Bowl
Last edited by brasilrams on November 16th, 2025, 8:34 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Please Login or Become a VIP Member to Remove Advertisment
- Cornell29
- Hall of Fame Member

- Posts: 8655
- Joined: September 26th, 2016, 8:56 am
- Has thanked: 79 times
- Been thanked: 503 times
Re: 8-2
Every NFC top team offense has struggled for a week or two or more. Lions and Eagles offenses are struggling today. GB and Philly offense struggled last week. Seattle offense struggled today. Bears offense struggled today.
Fix it and play better next week.
Fix it and play better next week.
Please Login or Become a VIP Member to Remove Advertisment
- DelMar
- VIP Member

- Posts: 7085
- Joined: January 31st, 2023, 11:01 am
- Has thanked: 1049 times
- Been thanked: 644 times
Re: 8-2
^ THISCornell29 wrote: ↑November 16th, 2025, 6:32 pm Every NFC top team offense has struggled for a week or two or more. Lions and Eagles offenses are struggling today. GB and Philly offense struggled last week. Seattle offense struggled today. Bears offense struggled today.
Fix it and play better next week.
Please Login or Become a VIP Member to Remove Advertisment
- NorCal RF
- VIP Member

- Posts: 7558
- Joined: October 26th, 2016, 12:11 pm
- Has thanked: 63 times
- Been thanked: 430 times
Re: 8-2
Corum has played fine this year. Not today though. He was not a good matchup for the D they went against today. This was clearly a Kyren game n IMO they should have ran the stretch runs more with Kyren today. The few times they did with him was it stopped?……..ocram23 wrote: ↑November 16th, 2025, 6:24 pmyes their D is solid but I am not going to sit here and say the game plan today was good. Corum sucks....yes I said it he sucks. He is so tiny out there. Put in Hunter.
Running straight up the middle with Corum is just bad play calling. KW is so much better. Running 3 straight times up the middle with a midget on the goal line is unacceptable..JMO
Hell what was it just 2 weeks ago some in here were calling for Corum to start? It’s why I SMFH on what some say in here. Everything is always I want instant perfect play now or there is something wrong with this team. I’ll say it again do we watch the other 31 teams……
Not you oc by the way……
Please Login or Become a VIP Member to Remove Advertisment
Please Login or Become a VIP Member to Remove Advertisment
- ocram23
- Hall of Fame Member

- Posts: 11051
- Joined: October 15th, 2019, 6:12 pm
- Has thanked: 123 times
- Been thanked: 315 times
Re: 8-2
respect your opinion but I have never been a fan of Corum. I didn't understand the pick from day 1 and as far as I am concerned I was right. He is way too small and he doesn't have another gear. I know Seattle D is good but McVay's play calling made them better today. His goal line calls were awful. Our defense played great today and let's face it this game should not have been close with Darnold throwing 4 INT'sNorCal RF wrote: ↑November 16th, 2025, 6:53 pmCorum has played fine this year. Not today though. He was not a good matchup for the D they went against today. This was clearly a Kyren game n IMO they should have ran the stretch runs more with Kyren today. The few times they did with him was it stopped?……..ocram23 wrote: ↑November 16th, 2025, 6:24 pm
yes their D is solid but I am not going to sit here and say the game plan today was good. Corum sucks....yes I said it he sucks. He is so tiny out there. Put in Hunter.
Running straight up the middle with Corum is just bad play calling. KW is so much better. Running 3 straight times up the middle with a midget on the goal line is unacceptable..JMO
Hell what was it just 2 weeks ago some in here were calling for Corum to start? It’s why I SMFH on what some say in here. Everything is always I want instant perfect play now or there is something wrong with this team. I’ll say it again do we watch the other 31 teams……
Not you oc by the way……
Please Login or Become a VIP Member to Remove Advertisment
Please Login or Become a VIP Member to Remove Advertisment
Please Login or Become a VIP Member to Remove Advertisment
- GoldenRam
- Hall of Fame Member

- Posts: 3566
- Joined: April 29th, 2017, 9:36 pm
- Has thanked: 92 times
- Been thanked: 137 times
Re: 8-2
Thank you. At one point KW was 9-90 and he finishes with just 12 carries. Corum might as well have been inactive for what he gave us. We should have run KW at least 20 times IMONorCal RF wrote: ↑November 16th, 2025, 4:34 pmWe did. But Seattle had it well schemed. Their D is damn good. JMO we should have ran a bit more with Kyren today once they were handling our 13 lineup. We did run but as much with Corum and IMO Corum did not have a good game. I would have gone with just Kyren in the second half. Again each week is different…….
GR .. shaken not stirred
Please Login or Become a VIP Member to Remove Advertisment
- NorCal RF
- VIP Member

- Posts: 7558
- Joined: October 26th, 2016, 12:11 pm
- Has thanked: 63 times
- Been thanked: 430 times
Re: 8-2
Here is the thing though. Darnold is their starter and he threw the 4 picks because on all four we got some pressure n those 3 DB’s finished. You cant disregard that. How many times have we seen any D, including this one, drop what should be INT. Again we made plays n thier QB didn’t. Our QB didn’t throw any INT’s…………….ocram23 wrote: ↑November 16th, 2025, 7:22 pmrespect your opinion but I have never been a fan of Corum. I didn't understand the pick from day 1 and as far as I am concerned I was right. He is way too small and he doesn't have another gear. I know Seattle D is good but McVay's play calling made them better today. His goal line calls were awful. Our defense played great today and let's face it this game should not have been close with Darnold throwing 4 INT'sNorCal RF wrote: ↑November 16th, 2025, 6:53 pm
Corum has played fine this year. Not today though. He was not a good matchup for the D they went against today. This was clearly a Kyren game n IMO they should have ran the stretch runs more with Kyren today. The few times they did with him was it stopped?……..
Hell what was it just 2 weeks ago some in here were calling for Corum to start? It’s why I SMFH on what some say in here. Everything is always I want instant perfect play now or there is something wrong with this team. I’ll say it again do we watch the other 31 teams……
Not you oc by the way……
When playing an elite D like this we need a WR that can spread the field. Adams isn’t anymore n Nacua isn’t really that type of WR. And they did a great job scheming the 13 personnel. Again I think Kyren should have been out there a lot more and they needed to run him more.
Again with Corum I feel he has played well this year for his role. Today no n I agree just not the right back for that D……….
Please Login or Become a VIP Member to Remove Advertisment
- NorCal RF
- VIP Member

- Posts: 7558
- Joined: October 26th, 2016, 12:11 pm
- Has thanked: 63 times
- Been thanked: 430 times
Re: 8-2
Welcome.GoldenRam wrote: ↑November 16th, 2025, 7:38 pmThank you. At one point KW was 9-90 and he finishes with just 12 carries. Corum might as well have been inactive for what he gave us. We should have run KW at least 20 times IMONorCal RF wrote: ↑November 16th, 2025, 4:34 pm
We did. But Seattle had it well schemed. Their D is damn good. JMO we should have ran a bit more with Kyren today once they were handling our 13 lineup. We did run but as much with Corum and IMO Corum did not have a good game. I would have gone with just Kyren in the second half. Again each week is different…….
Kyren again I feel should have played the entire second half. Corum was not a good match for that D today. In part I agree with oc Corum was just too small and not physical enough against that D. They are really good…………..
Please Login or Become a VIP Member to Remove Advertisment
- ocram23
- Hall of Fame Member

- Posts: 11051
- Joined: October 15th, 2019, 6:12 pm
- Has thanked: 123 times
- Been thanked: 315 times
Re: 8-2
100% agree with you I think our D played great today. I was talking about the offense. agree to disagree with CorumNorCal RF wrote: ↑November 16th, 2025, 7:41 pmHere is the thing though. Darnold is their starter and he threw the 4 picks because on all four we got some pressure n those 3 DB’s finished. You cant disregard that. How many times have we seen any D, including this one, drop what should be INT. Again we made plays n thier QB didn’t. Our QB didn’t throw any INT’s…………….ocram23 wrote: ↑November 16th, 2025, 7:22 pm
respect your opinion but I have never been a fan of Corum. I didn't understand the pick from day 1 and as far as I am concerned I was right. He is way too small and he doesn't have another gear. I know Seattle D is good but McVay's play calling made them better today. His goal line calls were awful. Our defense played great today and let's face it this game should not have been close with Darnold throwing 4 INT's
When playing an elite D like this we need a WR that can spread the field. Adams isn’t anymore n Nacua isn’t really that type of WR. And they did a great job scheming the 13 personnel. Again I think Kyren should have been out there a lot more and they needed to run him more.
Again with Corum I feel he has played well this year for his role. Today no n I agree just not the right back for that D……….
Please Login or Become a VIP Member to Remove Advertisment
- NorCal RF
- VIP Member

- Posts: 7558
- Joined: October 26th, 2016, 12:11 pm
- Has thanked: 63 times
- Been thanked: 430 times
Re: 8-2
I think with Corum oc I agree he didn’t play well today. I’m just saying as RB2 he hasn’t been bad outside of today. He hasn’t “sucked” the entire year. But today yes I agree…………..ocram23 wrote: ↑November 16th, 2025, 7:59 pm100% agree with you I think our D played great today. I was talking about the offense. agree to disagree with CorumNorCal RF wrote: ↑November 16th, 2025, 7:41 pm
Here is the thing though. Darnold is their starter and he threw the 4 picks because on all four we got some pressure n those 3 DB’s finished. You cant disregard that. How many times have we seen any D, including this one, drop what should be INT. Again we made plays n thier QB didn’t. Our QB didn’t throw any INT’s…………….
When playing an elite D like this we need a WR that can spread the field. Adams isn’t anymore n Nacua isn’t really that type of WR. And they did a great job scheming the 13 personnel. Again I think Kyren should have been out there a lot more and they needed to run him more.
Again with Corum I feel he has played well this year for his role. Today no n I agree just not the right back for that D……….
Please Login or Become a VIP Member to Remove Advertisment
- ocram23
- Hall of Fame Member

- Posts: 11051
- Joined: October 15th, 2019, 6:12 pm
- Has thanked: 123 times
- Been thanked: 315 times
Re: 8-2
I would like to see Hunter....Corum is too small plus he doesn't have burner speed either
Please Login or Become a VIP Member to Remove Advertisment
- brasilrams
- VIP Member

- Posts: 5679
- Joined: January 6th, 2018, 5:29 pm
- Has thanked: 527 times
- Been thanked: 191 times
Re: 8-2
CORUM is awesome. Seattle's d adjusted and when they did that not even Kw could do anything. Mcvay tried going back to kw and it didn't work either.NorCal RF wrote: ↑November 16th, 2025, 6:53 pmCorum has played fine this year. Not today though. He was not a good matchup for the D they went against today. This was clearly a Kyren game n IMO they should have ran the stretch runs more with Kyren today. The few times they did with him was it stopped?……..ocram23 wrote: ↑November 16th, 2025, 6:24 pm
yes their D is solid but I am not going to sit here and say the game plan today was good. Corum sucks....yes I said it he sucks. He is so tiny out there. Put in Hunter.
Running straight up the middle with Corum is just bad play calling. KW is so much better. Running 3 straight times up the middle with a midget on the goal line is unacceptable..JMO
Hell what was it just 2 weeks ago some in here were calling for Corum to start? It’s why I SMFH on what some say in here. Everything is always I want instant perfect play now or there is something wrong with this team. I’ll say it again do we watch the other 31 teams……
Not you oc by the way……
Please Login or Become a VIP Member to Remove Advertisment
- brasilrams
- VIP Member

- Posts: 5679
- Joined: January 6th, 2018, 5:29 pm
- Has thanked: 527 times
- Been thanked: 191 times
Re: 8-2
Kw had 3-4 long runs and after Seattle d adjusted he couldn't do anything just like CORUM couldn't either. I think mxvay got out coached today because his offense could not move the ball at all after the first quarter.GoldenRam wrote: ↑November 16th, 2025, 7:38 pmThank you. At one point KW was 9-90 and he finishes with just 12 carries. Corum might as well have been inactive for what he gave us. We should have run KW at least 20 times IMONorCal RF wrote: ↑November 16th, 2025, 4:34 pm
We did. But Seattle had it well schemed. Their D is damn good. JMO we should have ran a bit more with Kyren today once they were handling our 13 lineup. We did run but as much with Corum and IMO Corum did not have a good game. I would have gone with just Kyren in the second half. Again each week is different…….
Please Login or Become a VIP Member to Remove Advertisment
- Truth
- Hall of Fame Member

- Posts: 2023
- Joined: December 23rd, 2019, 8:55 pm
- Has thanked: 16 times
- Been thanked: 71 times
Re: 8-2
Never said he suckedbrasilrams wrote: ↑November 16th, 2025, 6:30 pmFunny because before the season you were saying Stafford is old and he sucks. LolTruth wrote: ↑November 16th, 2025, 6:04 pm I think the main reason Rams are 8-2 is Stafford is playing at a high level (you could argue it’s the best of his career given the stats) and the Rams lead the league in fewest penalties.
So if you have good Qb play and don’t beat yourselves with stupid penalties, you should keep winning games.
I think we are in a better spot this year than last year. I know most of the guys are the same but just feels were a little better. I don’t think we’re good enough to just dominate other good teams, but I think the Rams are good enough to win close games playing mistake free football against other good teams. I don’t see the gap in physicality in say the Eagles/Rams this year that I felt last year. And there’s no other teams in the NFC that are playing lights out football either.
It wouldn’t surprise me to see the Rams be the slight favorites now to get to the Super Bowl
He is old
I never wanted him extended into 2026 given his age and salary.
He was always coming back in 2025 due to his prior deal.
I haven’t wavered from any of those things. If Stafford is good in 2026 I’ll definitely admit being wrong then. This year we were riding with him regardless. And there was zero chance of him walking away from his guaranteed 2025 deal even if he wasn’t extended into 2026.
Please Login or Become a VIP Member to Remove Advertisment
- NorCal RF
- VIP Member

- Posts: 7558
- Joined: October 26th, 2016, 12:11 pm
- Has thanked: 63 times
- Been thanked: 430 times
Re: 8-2
But he did get 3-4 yard runs up the middle which against that D gets us in 3rd n short instead of 3rd n long. 3rd n long against that team? Bring in punt team……..brasilrams wrote: ↑November 16th, 2025, 8:38 pmKw had 3-4 long runs and after Seattle d adjusted he couldn't do anything just like CORUM couldn't either. I think mxvay got out coached today because his offense could not move the ball at all after the first quarter.
The problem was b Corum was in there a lot n couldn’t get a yard or two. KW at least has a knack of having more productive runs if he is on the field……………..
McVay not running more stretch runs today I didn’t get. What few he ran worked with KW. Past weeks I liked the tackle to tackle runs but not today AGAIN against that D. Week to week league………..
Please Login or Become a VIP Member to Remove Advertisment
- Commish
- Hall of Fame Member

- Posts: 2289
- Joined: August 5th, 2016, 12:00 pm
- Has thanked: 6 times
- Been thanked: 140 times
Re: 8-2
The Buccaneers looked quite vulnerable defensively in losing to the Bills yesterday, however they do figure to be fired up vs. our team, playing at home and pretty much desperate for a victory following two straight defeats.
The Rams will need to be 'firing on all cylinders,' both offensively and defensively, for the entire game in order to win on Sunday night...
RAM SEASON!!
--The Commish
UHURA: "Do you think that's all they ever had?"
KIRK: "No, but it's all they had left."
KIRK: "No, but it's all they had left."
Please Login or Become a VIP Member to Remove Advertisment
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: brasilrams and 14 guests
