Coming back to haunt us…?

[RGtheFirst]

Saffold loss hurt us up the middle too…

[harkin]

“In the short term, however, nothing is haunting this team more than the loss of Troy Hill. Hill signed a two-year, $9 million deal with the Cleveland Browns this offseason, the same annual salary the Rams handed to Jackson.”

It’s not all on Raheem.

Signing Jackson then drafting Tutu with their highest pick was shocking and a few of us said it at the time. Drafting two more receivers lower down was just mind boggling.

This past off-season was very much Martz v2.0.

[Rams since '66]

Only one choice in the first two rounds, you don't blow it on a gimmick player.

[Hacksaw]

The article in the other thread that @harkin posted does put a slightly different spin on it, and possibly the reason McSnead didn't take Humphries.
That said, you can never have too much quality beef.

It’s fine that the Rams aren’t running play-action and instead are just dropping back to pass—remember, Stafford’s still leading the league in EPA per play! But the practice has exposed an incongruity in their team-building. Corbett, Allen, and Edwards made sense as an offensive interior when the Rams were living and dying with a wide zone rushing attack and the play-action boots that develop off of that; now that they no longer need to dedicate themselves to the play-action game to generate a passing offense, those interior blockers are being asked to hold their water in traditional pass protection. They aren’t built for that.“

[RAMFAN71]

Well- cannot swap out the OL for a bigger and better one. So how about we change the plays? Just a thought. Stafford will have to try and adjust.

[Hacksaw]

Well- cannot swap out the OL for a bigger and better one. So how about we change the plays? Just a thought. Stafford will have to try and adjust.

Agreed, I think that Stafford will need to adjust and the game plan will have to adjust to the loss of Woods and the addition of Beckham.

What I'm looking for is the defense to get more stingy.