Page 15 of 16
Re: Game Thread - Rams at Packers
Posted: January 16th, 2021, 4:48 pm
by Cornell29
Bottom post of the previous page:
armyram wrote: ↑January 16th, 2021, 4:45 pm
luckenbill56 wrote: ↑January 16th, 2021, 4:41 pm
Cornell29,
"Everybody wants a Rogers." Well stated. Unfortunately, every year some silly team thinks the next one is in the Draft.
So settle for mediocre!!! That’s the fucking answer
Again the rams problems are bigger than qb. Especially today. The answer is to fix the ol and get a take the top off the defense, wr. Trade/cut Goff if he doesn't live up to his contract 2 years from now, when his contract is movable.
Re: Game Thread - Rams at Packers
Posted: January 16th, 2021, 4:49 pm
by luckenbill56
If we returned to the old NFL days. I believe it would matter little to Rogers. However, Brees, Brady, and Big Ben would be out of the league.
Re: Game Thread - Rams at Packers
Posted: January 16th, 2021, 4:50 pm
by Cornell29
Truth wrote: ↑January 16th, 2021, 4:45 pm
luckenbill56 wrote: ↑January 16th, 2021, 4:41 pm
Cornell29,
"Everybody wants a Rogers." Well stated. Unfortunately, every year some silly team thinks the next one is in the Draft.
I think its a good use of draft capital to keep looking for one though, given how valuable they are. The Chiefs had an in his prime Alex Smith, and that didn't stop them from seeing a guy they thought as having a ton of potential Mahomes, and drafting him. And Mahomes took the Chiefs to an entirely different level.
I hope the Rams take this proactive approach in their drafts. If they see a QB they think can take them to a level higher than Goff, they need to take a shot at getting him.
Getting guys like Mahomes requires picking high in the draft. The way the rams keep making the playoffs and finishing above .500, I doubt they will be in position to anytime soon.
Re: Game Thread - Rams at Packers
Posted: January 16th, 2021, 5:02 pm
by armyram
Cornell29 wrote: ↑January 16th, 2021, 4:48 pm
armyram wrote: ↑January 16th, 2021, 4:45 pm
So settle for mediocre!!! That’s the fucking answer
Again the rams problems are bigger than qb. Especially today. The answer is to fix the ol and get a take the top off the defense, wr. Trade/cut Goff if he doesn't live up to his contract 2 years from now, when his contract is movable.
Bullshit Cornell, no team is perfect that’s why you pay the big dollars to key positions, so they step up when we need them. Yes it’s a team sport but our OLine isn’t terrible . Our defense is great but will struggle at times. We need a playmaker QB and yes, a speed wide receiver... but wtf, we never go deep and even give our receivers a chance. Last time we went deep was with Wolford, same damn receivers, explain that!
Re: Game Thread - Rams at Packers
Posted: January 16th, 2021, 5:12 pm
by Raminec
armyram wrote: ↑January 16th, 2021, 5:02 pm
Cornell29 wrote: ↑January 16th, 2021, 4:48 pm
Again the rams problems are bigger than qb. Especially today. The answer is to fix the ol and get a take the top off the defense, wr. Trade/cut Goff if he doesn't live up to his contract 2 years from now, when his contract is movable.
Bullshit Cornell, no team is perfect that’s why you pay the big dollars to key positions, so they step up when we need them. Yes it’s a team sport but our OLine isn’t terrible . Our defense is great but will struggle at times. We need a playmaker QB and yes, a speed wide receiver... but wtf, we never go deep and even give our receivers a chance. Last time we went deep was with Wolford, same damn receivers, explain that!
Rams defense couldn’t get off the field but it’s Goff and the offense at fault. If they had that playmaker QB today and your speed wide receiver they would have watched over half the game from the sidelines but you haven’t figured that out yet.
Re: Game Thread - Rams at Packers
Posted: January 16th, 2021, 5:21 pm
by armyram
Raminec wrote: ↑January 16th, 2021, 5:12 pm
armyram wrote: ↑January 16th, 2021, 5:02 pm
Bullshit Cornell, no team is perfect that’s why you pay the big dollars to key positions, so they step up when we need them. Yes it’s a team sport but our OLine isn’t terrible . Our defense is great but will struggle at times. We need a playmaker QB and yes, a speed wide receiver... but wtf, we never go deep and even give our receivers a chance. Last time we went deep was with Wolford, same damn receivers, explain that!
Rams defense couldn’t get off the field but it’s Goff and the offense at fault. If they had that playmaker QB today and your speed wide receiver they would have watched over half the game from the sidelines but you haven’t figured that out yet.
Watch the rest of the games today, maybe you will see what a franchise QB should do since Rogers wasn’t enough
Re: Game Thread - Rams at Packers
Posted: January 16th, 2021, 6:39 pm
by luckenbill56
QB in Pro Football is the most important SINGLE position in professional sports. Many quarterbacks are good, but there are very few great ones. Goff got the Rams to the Super Bowl. Therefore, is he really a failure? Rogers sat on the bench for years behind one of the most overrated QBs of all time in my opinion. Favre was never as good as Rogers. I repeat never. Goff keeps the Rams in the hunt. After more than a decade of having no chance. He is a major improvement from where we were.
Re: Game Thread - Rams at Packers
Posted: January 16th, 2021, 6:59 pm
by Cornell29
armyram wrote: ↑January 16th, 2021, 5:02 pm
Cornell29 wrote: ↑January 16th, 2021, 4:48 pm
Again the rams problems are bigger than qb. Especially today. The answer is to fix the ol and get a take the top off the defense, wr. Trade/cut Goff if he doesn't live up to his contract 2 years from now, when his contract is movable.
Bullshit Cornell, no team is perfect that’s why you pay the big dollars to key positions, so they step up when we need them. Yes it’s a team sport but our OLine isn’t terrible . Our defense is great but will struggle at times. We need a playmaker QB and yes, a speed wide receiver... but wtf, we never go deep and even give our receivers a chance. Last time we went deep was with Wolford, same damn receivers, explain that!
Deep to who? I watch the game I didnt see a wr running open down the field and Goff missed him. No one was open. The TV commentary said the same thing. They would have shown the miss opportunity on a replay if Goff missed somebody open. Goff use to hit Cooks down the field all the time. He even did in against the saints in the playoff game. There isn't any, take the top off the defense, wr on the team. Goff didn't just dink and dunk. Look at the 1st quarter drive.
Re: Game Thread - Rams at Packers
Posted: January 16th, 2021, 7:09 pm
by armyram
Cornell29 wrote: ↑January 16th, 2021, 6:59 pm
armyram wrote: ↑January 16th, 2021, 5:02 pm
Bullshit Cornell, no team is perfect that’s why you pay the big dollars to key positions, so they step up when we need them. Yes it’s a team sport but our OLine isn’t terrible . Our defense is great but will struggle at times. We need a playmaker QB and yes, a speed wide receiver... but wtf, we never go deep and even give our receivers a chance. Last time we went deep was with Wolford, same damn receivers, explain that!
Deep to who? I watch the game I didnt see a wr running open down the field and Goff missed him. No one was open. The TV commentary said the same thing. They would have shown the miss opportunity on a replay if Goff missed somebody open. Goff use to hit Cooks down the field all the time. He even did in against the saints in the playoff game. There isn't any, take the top off the defense, wr on the team. Goff didn't just dink and dunk. Look at the 1st quarter drive.
So why did we open the field with Wolford ? Sometimes you have to put the ball in a good spot and let your receiver make his money, it’s obvious Goff can’t do that or McVay doesn’t trust in him to do that
Re: Game Thread - Rams at Packers
Posted: January 16th, 2021, 8:37 pm
by Cornell29
armyram wrote: ↑January 16th, 2021, 7:09 pm
Cornell29 wrote: ↑January 16th, 2021, 6:59 pm
Deep to who? I watch the game I didnt see a wr running open down the field and Goff missed him. No one was open. The TV commentary said the same thing. They would have shown the miss opportunity on a replay if Goff missed somebody open. Goff use to hit Cooks down the field all the time. He even did in against the saints in the playoff game. There isn't any, take the top off the defense, wr on the team. Goff didn't just dink and dunk. Look at the 1st quarter drive.
So why did we open the field with Wolford ? Sometimes you have to put the ball in a good spot and let your receiver make his money, it’s obvious Goff can’t do that or McVay doesn’t trust in him to do that
Wolford air out to 20 yarders against the cards. Goff did the same thing in the 1st quarter.
Re: Game Thread - Rams at Packers
Posted: January 16th, 2021, 8:43 pm
by armyram
Cornell29 wrote: ↑January 16th, 2021, 8:37 pm
armyram wrote: ↑January 16th, 2021, 7:09 pm
So why did we open the field with Wolford ? Sometimes you have to put the ball in a good spot and let your receiver make his money, it’s obvious Goff can’t do that or McVay doesn’t trust in him to do that
Wolford air out to 20 yarders against the cards. Goff did the same thing in the 1st quarter.
Cornell, as I said, I respect you for standing by your QB and he did not have a bad game but he also didn’t make plays to win the game. We agree to disagree, but we will not win a SB with him because he doesn’t have a strength in his game
Re: Game Thread - Rams at Packers
Posted: January 16th, 2021, 8:51 pm
by Cornell29
armyram wrote: ↑January 16th, 2021, 8:43 pm
Cornell29 wrote: ↑January 16th, 2021, 8:37 pm
Wolford air out to 20 yarders against the cards. Goff did the same thing in the 1st quarter.
Cornell, as I said, I respect you for standing by your QB and he did not have a bad game but he also didn’t make plays to win the game. We agree to disagree, but we will not win a SB with him because he doesn’t have a strength in his game
Its not about standing by Goff. Its only about 4 or 5 qbs in the nfl that had a chance of out dueling Rodgers if they had a ram uniform on today.
Find me a way to get Mahomes, Watkins maybe Allen or Brees or Brady and I'll be all for it. You replace Goff with any other quarterback other than those 5, they still lose today.
Allen, despite having more weapons then Goff didn't out perform Goff today.
Re: Game Thread - Rams at Packers
Posted: January 16th, 2021, 9:49 pm
by My2Cents
armyram wrote: ↑January 16th, 2021, 4:44 pm
My2Cents wrote: ↑January 16th, 2021, 4:27 pm
I thought overall Goff had a good game. We totally lost this game in the trenches, IMO.
Yes, a good game for Goff, 174 yards??? Really??? Once again, y’all’s expectations of a franchise QB is so freaking low it’s disgusting. He didn’t lose the game for us or turn the ball over but with Goff, we don’t go deep and take the risk any QB would. And his mobility is atrocious. I’m not blaming this loss on him but he’s gotta bring something to the table besides an occasional nice pass. Nope, our trenches held up as good as expected.... someone has to make a play. Someone has to make a play, we need a playmaker.
I’ve posted multiple times that Goff is a system QB who is only as good as those surrounding him, so I’m not a Goff apologist or fanboy. However, he completed 21 of 27 passes with zero turnovers. He had a couple pass completions for distance, but was often pressured or it appeared his wr weren’t open. Conversely, Rodgers had all day to make plays and his wr get open. Their Oline was far superior to the Rams. Several times they were blocking our safeties on run plays.
Re: Game Thread - Rams at Packers
Posted: January 16th, 2021, 11:58 pm
by Rampager66
Amazingly, Goff and the offense are still the focus and the swiss cheese overhyped D that couldn't make 1 stinkin play all game long gets a free pass.... again. Oh wait. Our all world Defender did donate a 15 yard sore bitch loser penalty to display some of his great leadership qualities... And wasn't our all universe corner on point as well ....
But Goff should have been able to out gun AR12 in spite of all this and bail us out with limited opportunities and them dictating the play. Cause John Wolford would have for sure because well.... Goff sucks
Never mind that GB had the ball for 13+ minutes more, ran 22 more plays, w/o benefit of a takeaway, had 6 sustained scoring drives netting 4 TD's and 2 FG's and a 7th where they kneeled in victory formation inside our 5 and played with a the lead all day.... but Goff sucks...
No matter how much you try you can't pin this on the offense. Few possessions, and constantly playing from behind they managed to keep us in the game until the D broke again in the 2nd half surrendering a 60 yard run that lead to an easy 7 and a 58 yard TD pass.
If the D really was what they were sold to be, 18 points would have been enough... a total that would have been higher if the D could have got off the field and gave us more possessions..
Fact is Goff played 2 playoff road games with a broken thumb and didn't turn it over once and did a decent job running things... 1 Win and and within 1 score into the 4th Q in the other.
Re: Game Thread - Rams at Packers
Posted: January 17th, 2021, 7:34 am
by Cornell29
Rampager66 wrote: ↑January 16th, 2021, 11:58 pm
Amazingly, Goff and the offense are still the focus and the swiss cheese overhyped D that couldn't make 1 stinkin play all game long gets a free pass.... again. Oh wait. Our all world Defender did donate a 15 yard sore bitch loser penalty to display some of his great leadership qualities... And wasn't our all universe corner on point as well ....
But Goff should have been able to out gun AR12 in spite of all this and bail us out with limited opportunities and them dictating the play. Cause John Wolford would have for sure because well.... Goff sucks
Never mind that GB had the ball for 13+ minutes more, ran 22 more plays, w/o benefit of a takeaway, had 6 sustained scoring drives netting 4 TD's and 2 FG's and a 7th where they kneeled in victory formation inside our 5 and played with a the lead all day.... but Goff sucks...
No matter how much you try you can't pin this on the offense. Few possessions, and constantly playing from behind they managed to keep us in the game until the D broke again in the 2nd half surrendering a 60 yard run that lead to an easy 7 and a 58 yard TD pass.
If the D really was what they were sold to be, 18 points would have been enough... a total that would have been higher if the D could have got off the field and gave us more possessions..
Fact is Goff played 2 playoff road games with a broken thumb and didn't turn it over once and did a decent job running things... 1 Win and and within 1 score into the 4th Q in the other.
This
All I heard was the rams had a SB defense. They just needed a offense that didn't turn over the ball and can score a few tds.
We found out yesterday that wasn't true. The rams D played the worse out of all the teams that played yesterday.
Re: Game Thread - Rams at Packers
Posted: January 17th, 2021, 9:06 am
by Rampager66
Cornell29 wrote: ↑January 17th, 2021, 7:34 am
Rampager66 wrote: ↑January 16th, 2021, 11:58 pm
Amazingly, Goff and the offense are still the focus and the swiss cheese overhyped D that couldn't make 1 stinkin play all game long gets a free pass.... again. Oh wait. Our all world Defender did donate a 15 yard sore bitch loser penalty to display some of his great leadership qualities... And wasn't our all universe corner on point as well ....
But Goff should have been able to out gun AR12 in spite of all this and bail us out with limited opportunities and them dictating the play. Cause John Wolford would have for sure because well.... Goff sucks
Never mind that GB had the ball for 13+ minutes more, ran 22 more plays, w/o benefit of a takeaway, had 6 sustained scoring drives netting 4 TD's and 2 FG's and a 7th where they kneeled in victory formation inside our 5 and played with a the lead all day.... but Goff sucks...
No matter how much you try you can't pin this on the offense. Few possessions, and constantly playing from behind they managed to keep us in the game until the D broke again in the 2nd half surrendering a 60 yard run that lead to an easy 7 and a 58 yard TD pass.
If the D really was what they were sold to be, 18 points would have been enough... a total that would have been higher if the D could have got off the field and gave us more possessions..
Fact is Goff played 2 playoff road games with a broken thumb and didn't turn it over once and did a decent job running things... 1 Win and and within 1 score into the 4th Q in the other.
This
All I heard was the rams had a SB defense. They just needed a offense that didn't turn over the ball and can score a few tds.
We found out yesterday that wasn't true. The rams D played the worse out of all the teams that played yesterday.
I put this up before but here it is again...
A list of the shitbag Offenses, many with 2nd (and in 1 case a 3rd) string, or just plain shitty or struggling QB's that the Rams D got fat on, a steady diet that eventually skewed what they really are... and imo, along with media hype about them that they themselves over indulged in, set them up for yesterdays complete embarrassment.
Ari - 2x - 1st game gave up 28 points vs Murray, - 6th ranked O... no Murray 2nd meeting, vs 2nd string ex CFLer Streveler... Rams almost pitch a SO.
SF - 2x - 2nd game vs 3rd string QB Mullins - Offense 15th ranked.
Sea - 3x - all meetings 2nd half of the season when Hags Offense plummeted from 1st to 17th ranked.
Mia - Tua - 22nd
Bears - Trubisky - 26th
NE - Newton - 27th
Phi - Wentz - 28th
Was - Haskins - 30th
Giants - Jones - 31st
Jets - Darnold - 32nd - Ugliest game the D played before yesterday...
That's 6 of the 7 worst Offenses and 13 vs weaker or weakened offenses in 17 games but they still managed to lose 7 times. Elite defenses would not let that happen..
Jets, Bills and 2nd 9ers games were all lost at the end because the D couldn't finish after we came back and 3 games that would have given us the No.1 seed in the conference.
Next year they play, Indy, Ten, Hou, Jax, Chi, GB, Min, Det, Car, Dallas and our 6 divisional games. Based on this years No.s, there's few weak offenses there
The D will be lucky to finish top half next year, which is really who they are imo.
Some team will regret giving Staley the Head Coaching position based on this skewed 1 year sample size. Ditto for Robert Saleh, his D played the same sched and finished 5th overall, Arizona 13th.
Re: Game Thread - Rams at Packers
Posted: January 17th, 2021, 9:13 am
by Cornell29
Rampager66 wrote: ↑January 17th, 2021, 9:06 am
Cornell29 wrote: ↑January 17th, 2021, 7:34 am
This
All I heard was the rams had a SB defense. They just needed a offense that didn't turn over the ball and can score a few tds.
We found out yesterday that wasn't true. The rams D played the worse out of all the teams that played yesterday.
I put this up before but here it is again...
A list of the shitbag Offenses, many with 2nd (and in 1 case a 3rd) string, or just plain shitty or struggling QB's that the Rams D got fat on, a steady diet that eventually skewed what they really are... and imo, along with media hype about them that they themselves over indulged in, set them up for yesterdays complete embarrassment.
Ari - 2x - 1st game gave up 28 points vs Murray, - 6th ranked O... no Murray 2nd meeting, vs 2nd string ex CFLer Streveler... Rams almost pitch a SO.
SF - 2x - 2nd game vs 3rd string QB Mullins - Offense 15th ranked.
Sea - 3x - all meetings 2nd half of the season when Hags Offense plummeted from 1st to 17th ranked.
Mia - Tua - 22nd
Bears - Trubisky - 26th
NE - Newton - 27th
Phi - Wentz - 28th
Was - Haskins - 30th
Giants - Jones - 31st
Jets - Darnold - 32nd - Ugliest game the D played before yesterday...
That's 6 of the 7 worst Offenses and 13 vs weaker offenses in 17 games but they still managed to lose 7 times. Elite defenses would not let that happen.. Jets, Bills and 2nd 9ers games were all lost at the end because the D couldn't finish after we came back and 3 games that would have given us the No.1 seed in the conference.
Next year they play, Indy, Ten, Hou, Jax, Chi, GB, Min, Det, Car, Dallas and our 6 divisional games. Based on this years No's there's few weak offenses there
The D will be lucky to finish top half next year, which is really who they are imo.
Some team will regret giving Staley the Head Coaching position based on this skewed sample size. Ditto for Robert Saleh, His D played the same sched and finished 5th overall, Arizona 13th.
Some good points.
Rams defense definitely came up small yesterday. I believe they are overrated too. They are not the Ravens D of 2000, or Pats D of 2001 or Tampa D of 2002.
They aren't the Tampa D of 1999 either. That Tampa D went on the road and limited the GSOT in the NFC championship game. I was hoping for a similar performance against the Green Bay defense. I was wrong.
Re: Game Thread - Rams at Packers
Posted: January 17th, 2021, 9:24 am
by Rampager66
Cornell29 wrote: ↑January 17th, 2021, 9:13 am
Rampager66 wrote: ↑January 17th, 2021, 9:06 am
I put this up before but here it is again...
A list of the shitbag Offenses, many with 2nd (and in 1 case a 3rd) string, or just plain shitty or struggling QB's that the Rams D got fat on, a steady diet that eventually skewed what they really are... and imo, along with media hype about them that they themselves over indulged in, set them up for yesterdays complete embarrassment.
Ari - 2x - 1st game gave up 28 points vs Murray, - 6th ranked O... no Murray 2nd meeting, vs 2nd string ex CFLer Streveler... Rams almost pitch a SO.
SF - 2x - 2nd game vs 3rd string QB Mullins - Offense 15th ranked.
Sea - 3x - all meetings 2nd half of the season when Hags Offense plummeted from 1st to 17th ranked.
Mia - Tua - 22nd
Bears - Trubisky - 26th
NE - Newton - 27th
Phi - Wentz - 28th
Was - Haskins - 30th
Giants - Jones - 31st
Jets - Darnold - 32nd - Ugliest game the D played before yesterday...
That's 6 of the 7 worst Offenses and 13 vs weaker offenses in 17 games but they still managed to lose 7 times. Elite defenses would not let that happen.. Jets, Bills and 2nd 9ers games were all lost at the end because the D couldn't finish after we came back and 3 games that would have given us the No.1 seed in the conference.
Next year they play, Indy, Ten, Hou, Jax, Chi, GB, Min, Det, Car, Dallas and our 6 divisional games. Based on this years No's there's few weak offenses there
The D will be lucky to finish top half next year, which is really who they are imo.
Some team will regret giving Staley the Head Coaching position based on this skewed sample size. Ditto for Robert Saleh, His D played the same sched and finished 5th overall, Arizona 13th.
Some good points.
Rams defense definitely came up small yesterday. I believe they are overrated too. They are not the Ravens D of 2000, or Pats D of 2001 or Tampa D of 2002.
They aren't the Tampa D of 1999 either. That Tampa D went on the road and limited the GSOT in the NFC championship game. I was hoping for a similar performance against the Green Bay defense. I was wrong.
" Goffs wasting a stellar Defensive season.." ;)
Re: Game Thread - Rams at Packers
Posted: January 17th, 2021, 9:24 am
by ocram23
luckenbill56 wrote: ↑January 16th, 2021, 4:46 pm
Why don't we just bring back Bradford. Get Goff out of here it's all his fault. The Defense and Oline sucked PERIOD.
defense played terrible yesterday. way too many dropped INT's by our defense. In one drive towards the end of the 1st half our DB's dropped 2 picks back to back. You can't do that and expect to win the game.
Re: Game Thread - Rams at Packers
Posted: January 17th, 2021, 9:27 am
by ocram23
armyram wrote: ↑January 16th, 2021, 5:02 pm
Cornell29 wrote: ↑January 16th, 2021, 4:48 pm
Again the rams problems are bigger than qb. Especially today. The answer is to fix the ol and get a take the top off the defense, wr. Trade/cut Goff if he doesn't live up to his contract 2 years from now, when his contract is movable.
Bullshit Cornell, no team is perfect that’s why you pay the big dollars to key positions, so they step up when we need them. Yes it’s a team sport but our OLine isn’t terrible . Our defense is great but will struggle at times. We need a playmaker QB and yes, a speed wide receiver... but wtf, we never go deep and even give our receivers a chance. Last time we went deep was with Wolford, same damn receivers, explain that!
wasn't the OL ranked #3 overall in PFF??? Thought I remember hearing that. Rams aren't going to win with a mediocre QB. Just not going to happen. Defense played great all year until yesterday. We need to get a solid run stuffer DT, LB's and OL. Unfortunately because of his contract we are stuck with Goff so Rams better figure out what to do in spite of him.
Re: Game Thread - Rams at Packers
Posted: January 17th, 2021, 9:41 am
by Rampager66
ocram23 wrote: ↑January 17th, 2021, 9:24 am
luckenbill56 wrote: ↑January 16th, 2021, 4:46 pm
Why don't we just bring back Bradford. Get Goff out of here it's all his fault. The Defense and Oline sucked PERIOD.
defense played terrible yesterday. way too many dropped INT's by our defense. In one drive towards the end of the 1st half our DB's dropped 2 picks back to back. You can't do that and expect to win the game.
Are you suggesting the flawless Aaron Rodgers made a couple ill advised throws and he got away with them because he's so great.. we've been told QB's like him are perfect and only Goff does that... how can it be.

Re: Game Thread - Rams at Packers
Posted: January 17th, 2021, 9:50 am
by ocram23
Rampager66 wrote: ↑January 17th, 2021, 9:41 am
ocram23 wrote: ↑January 17th, 2021, 9:24 am
defense played terrible yesterday. way too many dropped INT's by our defense. In one drive towards the end of the 1st half our DB's dropped 2 picks back to back. You can't do that and expect to win the game.
Are you suggesting the flawless Aaron Rodgers made a couple ill advised throws and he got away with them because he's so great.. we've been told QB's like him are perfect and only Goff does that... how can it be.
let's not compare Rodgers to Goff please. Yes AR tried to force 2 balls in there at the end of the 1st half and Rams DB's dropped both balls.
Re: Game Thread - Rams at Packers
Posted: January 17th, 2021, 10:09 am
by Rampager66
ocram23 wrote: ↑January 17th, 2021, 9:50 am
Rampager66 wrote: ↑January 17th, 2021, 9:41 am
Are you suggesting the flawless Aaron Rodgers made a couple ill advised throws and he got away with them because he's so great.. we've been told QB's like him are perfect and only Goff does that... how can it be.
let's not compare Rodgers to Goff please. Yes AR tried to force 2 balls in there at the end of the 1st half and Rams DB's dropped both balls.
There's no comparison and I don't know how you came to that conclusion here. I was being facetious.... funny how someone like Rodgers gets a pass for how many years of failure now??? and Brees too. Yet they are put on the same pedestal as Brady... A decade since they won their SB's and they haven't gotten back and Goff's suddenly scum after being less then 2 years removed... It won't matter anyways, if we do get back with him as our QB, he's that last one that will get any credit...
Re: Game Thread - Rams at Packers
Posted: January 17th, 2021, 10:14 am
by ocram23
Rampager66 wrote: ↑January 17th, 2021, 10:09 am
ocram23 wrote: ↑January 17th, 2021, 9:50 am
let's not compare Rodgers to Goff please. Yes AR tried to force 2 balls in there at the end of the 1st half and Rams DB's dropped both balls.
There's no comparison and I don't know how you came to that conclusion here. I was being facetious.... funny how someone like Rodgers gets a pass for how many years of failure now??? and Brees too. Yet they are put on the same pedestal as Brady... A decade since they won their SB's and they haven't gotten back and Goff's suddenly scum after being less then 2 years removed... It won't matter anyways, if we do get back with him as our QB, he's that last one that will get any credit...
Because Rodgers is the best QB IN THE NFL IMO. That is why he gets a pass. Brees is arguably the most accurate passer in NFL history. Goff on the other hand has the most turnovers of any QB in the NFL since 2019. I could go on and on
Re: Game Thread - Rams at Packers
Posted: January 17th, 2021, 10:21 am
by Rampager66
ocram23 wrote: ↑January 17th, 2021, 10:14 am
Rampager66 wrote: ↑January 17th, 2021, 10:09 am
There's no comparison and I don't know how you came to that conclusion here. I was being facetious.... funny how someone like Rodgers gets a pass for how many years of failure now??? and Brees too. Yet they are put on the same pedestal as Brady... A decade since they won their SB's and they haven't gotten back and Goff's suddenly scum after being less then 2 years removed... It won't matter anyways, if we do get back with him as our QB, he's that last one that will get any credit...
Because Rodgers is the best QB IN THE NFL IMO. That is why he gets a pass. Brees is arguably the most accurate passer in NFL history. Goff on the other hand has the most turnovers of any QB in the NFL since 2019. I could go on and on
No Brady with 6 SB wins from 9 SB game appearances in 18 seasons and counting is the best QB in the world, if we're being honest.... but you go ahead and go on and on....
Re: Game Thread - Rams at Packers
Posted: January 17th, 2021, 10:24 am
by ocram23
Rampager66 wrote: ↑January 17th, 2021, 10:21 am
ocram23 wrote: ↑January 17th, 2021, 10:14 am
Because Rodgers is the best QB IN THE NFL IMO. That is why he gets a pass. Brees is arguably the most accurate passer in NFL history. Goff on the other hand has the most turnovers of any QB in the NFL since 2019. I could go on and on
No Brady with 6 SB wins from 9 SB game appearances in 18 seasons and counting is the best QB in the world, if we're being honest.... but you go ahead and go on and on....
Brady is the GOAT but the best QB in the league is Rodgers. Just my opinion
Re: Game Thread - Rams at Packers
Posted: January 17th, 2021, 10:53 am
by Rampager66
ocram23 wrote: ↑January 17th, 2021, 10:24 am
Rampager66 wrote: ↑January 17th, 2021, 10:21 am
No Brady with 6 SB wins from 9 SB game appearances in 18 seasons and counting is the best QB in the world, if we're being honest.... but you go ahead and go on and on....
Brady is the GOAT but the best QB in the league is Rodgers. Just my opinion
On Brady we can agree. Rodgers is the best right now if stats are all that matters. Here's a guy who claims he hasn't made it back to the SB because he hasn't had home field advantage and cold weather to play in. I would suggest that the best shouldn't need special circumstances for that to happen.
Re: Game Thread - Rams at Packers
Posted: January 17th, 2021, 10:57 am
by ocram23
Rampager66 wrote: ↑January 17th, 2021, 10:53 am
ocram23 wrote: ↑January 17th, 2021, 10:24 am
Brady is the GOAT but the best QB in the league is Rodgers. Just my opinion
On Brady we can agree. Rodgers is the best right now if stats are all that matters. Here's a guy who claims he hasn't made it back to the SB because he hasn't had home field advantage and cold weather to play in. I would suggest that the best shouldn't need special circumstances for that to happen.
I don't think the Packers had a good defense for many years. Look at the rosters too. GB doesn't attract many FA's either. Think he's done pretty well considering
Re: Game Thread - Rams at Packers
Posted: January 17th, 2021, 11:04 am
by Cornell29
ocram23 wrote: ↑January 17th, 2021, 9:50 am
Rampager66 wrote: ↑January 17th, 2021, 9:41 am
Are you suggesting the flawless Aaron Rodgers made a couple ill advised throws and he got away with them because he's so great.. we've been told QB's like him are perfect and only Goff does that... how can it be.
let's not compare Rodgers to Goff please. Yes AR tried to force 2 balls in there at the end of the 1st half and Rams DB's dropped both balls.
Rodgers > Goff
I do find it ironic that the same ones that compare Rodgers to Goff to bash Goff are the same ones who say, no you can't compare the two when you mention the near ints Rodgers threw.
Which one is it?
Re: Game Thread - Rams at Packers
Posted: January 17th, 2021, 11:12 am
by ocram23
Cornell29 wrote: ↑January 17th, 2021, 11:04 am
ocram23 wrote: ↑January 17th, 2021, 9:50 am
let's not compare Rodgers to Goff please. Yes AR tried to force 2 balls in there at the end of the 1st half and Rams DB's dropped both balls.
Rodgers > Goff
I do find it ironic that the same ones that compare Rodgers to Goff to bash Goff are the same ones who say, no you can't compare the two when you mention the near ints Rodgers threw.
Which one is it?
Rodgers is just a special player and if he throws picks once in a while IMO who cares. He makes so many other plays he does get the hall pass. I hope Goff hits the weight room in the off season and really gets serious about next year. I don't think there is a fan on this forum that wishes ill will towards him. We all want him to succeed.
Re: Game Thread - Rams at Packers
Posted: January 17th, 2021, 11:13 am
by ocram23
Cornell29 wrote: ↑January 17th, 2021, 11:04 am
ocram23 wrote: ↑January 17th, 2021, 9:50 am
let's not compare Rodgers to Goff please. Yes AR tried to force 2 balls in there at the end of the 1st half and Rams DB's dropped both balls.
Rodgers > Goff
I do find it ironic that the same ones that compare Rodgers to Goff to bash Goff are the same ones who say, no you can't compare the two when you mention the near ints Rodgers threw.
Which one is it?
Rodgers is just a special player and if he throws picks once in a while IMO who cares. He makes so many other plays he does get the hall pass. I hope Goff hits the weight room in the off season and really gets serious about next year. I don't think there is a fan on this forum that wishes ill will towards him. We all want him to succeed.