Baltimore & London Trips

[Slickjack]

If Sean flies the team back after the Baltimore game , as opposed to going directly to London and getting adjusted, I think its a mistake. Has anyone heard the plans on this?

[NorCal RF]

I’d would bet they are coming home after Baltimore. It is who he is. They come home n leave the day before a game. London though I suspect they will leave on Friday.

[ocram23]

I’d would bet they are coming home after Baltimore. It is who he is. They come home n leave the day before a game. London though I suspect they will leave on Friday.

not a fan of sending the NFL out of the country anywhere. the season is long enough and you should not put a team on a flight for 11 hours...total BS

[DVA_ram33]

I’d would bet they are coming home after Baltimore. It is who he is. They come home n leave the day before a game. London though I suspect they will leave on Friday.

not a fan of sending the NFL out of the country anywhere. the season is long enough and you should not put a team on a flight for 11 hours...total BS

money rules, they need to keep growing markets. Expect to see the number of foreign games grow.

[ocram23]

not a fan of sending the NFL out of the country anywhere. the season is long enough and you should not put a team on a flight for 11 hours...total BS

money rules, they need to keep growing markets. Expect to see the number of foreign games grow.

IMO NFL is king in America you don't need to grow the game globally. how much more money do you want to make?

[DVA_ram33]

money rules, they need to keep growing markets. Expect to see the number of foreign games grow.

IMO NFL is king in America you don't need to grow the game globally. how much more money do you want to make?

Capitalism = greed.

[Slickjack]

I would hate to see expansion and have the quality of play watered down, as in the NBA. I would like to see them allow more actives on game day.

[NorCal RF]

I’d would bet they are coming home after Baltimore. It is who he is. They come home n leave the day before a game. London though I suspect they will leave on Friday.

not a fan of sending the NFL out of the country anywhere. the season is long enough and you should not put a team on a flight for 11 hours...total BS

Oh I hate the over seas games. And my bet is teams don’t like them either………

[GlendoraRam]

IMO NFL is king in America you don't need to grow the game globally. how much more money do you want to make?

Capitalism = greed.

Socialism or communism = poverty for all.
Anything the government “gives” you will be used to control you. Grow dependent on the government and you automatically become a slave and lose your personal freedom.
The only solution is personal liberty and a strong moral code that understands, respects, and honors the responsibilities that this freedom demands.

[Jodat43]

Capitalism = greed.

Socialism or communism = poverty for all.
Anything the government “gives” you will be used to control you. Grow dependent on the government and you automatically become a slave and lose your personal freedom.
The only solution is personal liberty and a strong moral code that understands, respects, and honors the responsibilities that this freedom demands.

Perfectly stated

[Fatboy]

As long as we're buying , their selling ! -- the Fatboy

[NN1Badboy]

I’d would bet they are coming home after Baltimore. It is who he is. They come home n leave the day before a game. London though I suspect they will leave on Friday.

not a fan of sending the NFL out of the country anywhere. the season is long enough and you should not put a team on a flight for 11 hours...total BS

I couldn't agree more. Soccer is king everywhere else and I don't think we are going to change fans minds about that. It's way too much on a west coast team to fly to England. Leave that BS for east coast teams. But no, everybody wants their greasy hands in the pot.

[brasilrams]

money rules, they need to keep growing markets. Expect to see the number of foreign games grow.

IMO NFL is king in America you don't need to grow the game globally. how much more money do you want to make?

That’s an absolutely horrible take, OC. Just plain awful. First of all, you’re ignoring the most basic rule of any multinational company: rule number one = PROFIT. Why on earth would you limit the market to the USA if you can tap into a global one? By your logic, McDonald’s, Coca-Cola, Ford, and every other American company should have stayed in America and never expanded overseas — because hey, “why go abroad if you can make money at home,” right? C'mon......

And let’s be honest — it’s not just a bad take, it’s a selfish one. You do realize the NFL has fans worldwide, don’t you? By refusing to expand games overseas, you’re not just limiting business, you’re robbing millions of fans around the world of the chance to experience a live game in a stadium. It’s narrow-minded, short-sighted, and frankly, ridiculous.

Also, don't worry about the athletes not being able to "rest " because of those international flights . They are 20ish year old genetic freaks that fly charter .

[ocram23]

IMO NFL is king in America you don't need to grow the game globally. how much more money do you want to make?

That’s an absolutely horrible take, OC. Just plain awful. First of all, you’re ignoring the most basic rule of any multinational company: rule number one = PROFIT. Why on earth would you limit the market to the USA if you can tap into a global one? By your logic, McDonald’s, Coca-Cola, Ford, and every other American company should have stayed in America and never expanded overseas — because hey, “why go abroad if you can make money at home,” right? C'mon......

And let’s be honest — it’s not just a bad take, it’s a selfish one. You do realize the NFL has fans worldwide, don’t you? By refusing to expand games overseas, you’re not just limiting business, you’re robbing millions of fans around the world of the chance to experience a live game in a stadium. It’s narrow-minded, short-sighted, and frankly, ridiculous.

Also, don't worry about the athletes not being able to "rest " because of those international flights . They are 20ish year old genetic freaks that fly charter .

we aren't talking about a commodity we are talking about human beings. Roger could care less about the safety of his players and he has proven it on so many levels. The 17 game schedule is one, and don't worry he will push for the 18th game which is a total joke.
The players have made it well know they don't feel safe going to Brasil and so much to the fact they rarely leave the hotel when they go down there. But hey according to you it's who f'n cares because they need to make more money. You are part of the problem....this isn't soccer or basketball this is football which is extremely violent...
doesn't matter what they fly it still takes a major toll on the body.....

[brasilrams]

That’s an absolutely horrible take, OC. Just plain awful. First of all, you’re ignoring the most basic rule of any multinational company: rule number one = PROFIT. Why on earth would you limit the market to the USA if you can tap into a global one? By your logic, McDonald’s, Coca-Cola, Ford, and every other American company should have stayed in America and never expanded overseas — because hey, “why go abroad if you can make money at home,” right? C'mon......

And let’s be honest — it’s not just a bad take, it’s a selfish one. You do realize the NFL has fans worldwide, don’t you? By refusing to expand games overseas, you’re not just limiting business, you’re robbing millions of fans around the world of the chance to experience a live game in a stadium. It’s narrow-minded, short-sighted, and frankly, ridiculous.

Also, don't worry about the athletes not being able to "rest " because of those international flights . They are 20ish year old genetic freaks that fly charter .

we aren't talking about a commodity we are talking about human beings. Roger could care less about the safety of his players and he has proven it on so many levels. The 17 game schedule is one, and don't worry he will push for the 18th game which is a total joke.
The players have made it well know they don't feel safe going to Brasil and so much to the fact they rarely leave the hotel when they go down there. But hey according to you it's who f'n cares because they need to make more money. You are part of the problem....this isn't soccer or basketball this is football which is extremely violent...
doesn't matter what they fly it still takes a major toll on the body.....

Human beings that makes millions of dollars per year can’t travel to play a game? LOL. Your take is not just selfish, it’s downright stupid. Brazil is safer than a ton of places in the U.S. — and I can say that because I’ve lived in both countries. That’s called experience, something you clearly don’t have.

And let’s be real: by your logic, Brazil itself isn’t even the issue — international games are. So tell me, if Brazil is supposedly “too dangerous” (typical ignorant take from someone who’s never set foot there), then why don’t you want games in London or Ireland? Too dangerous again? Pathetic.

Honestly, just STFU, OC. The more you type, the more you embarrass yourself.

[ocram23]

we aren't talking about a commodity we are talking about human beings. Roger could care less about the safety of his players and he has proven it on so many levels. The 17 game schedule is one, and don't worry he will push for the 18th game which is a total joke.
The players have made it well know they don't feel safe going to Brasil and so much to the fact they rarely leave the hotel when they go down there. But hey according to you it's who f'n cares because they need to make more money. You are part of the problem....this isn't soccer or basketball this is football which is extremely violent...
doesn't matter what they fly it still takes a major toll on the body.....

Human beings can’t travel to play a game? LOL. Your take is not just selfish, it’s downright stupid. Brazil is safer than a ton of places in the U.S. — and I can say that because I’ve lived in both countries. That’s called experience, something you clearly don’t have.

And let’s be real: by your logic, Brazil itself isn’t even the issue — international games are. So tell me, if Brazil is supposedly “too dangerous” (typical ignorant take from someone who’s never set foot there), then why don’t you want games in London or Ireland? Too dangerous again? Pathetic.

Honestly, just STFU, OC. The more you type, the more you embarrass yourself.

just par for the course with your takes. you consistently show that you are a complete moron.....there have been multiple interviews with NFL players talking about Brazil and how dangerous it is down there and how they don't feel safe walking the streets.
West coast teams should not have to fly 11+ hours to play a freaking game.
FYI the murder rate in Brazil is 4x higher than in the US so spare me the BS.

do us all a favor and don't respond

[brasilrams]

Human beings can’t travel to play a game? LOL. Your take is not just selfish, it’s downright stupid. Brazil is safer than a ton of places in the U.S. — and I can say that because I’ve lived in both countries. That’s called experience, something you clearly don’t have.

And let’s be real: by your logic, Brazil itself isn’t even the issue — international games are. So tell me, if Brazil is supposedly “too dangerous” (typical ignorant take from someone who’s never set foot there), then why don’t you want games in London or Ireland? Too dangerous again? Pathetic.

Honestly, just STFU, OC. The more you type, the more you embarrass yourself.

just par for the course with your takes. you consistently show that you are a complete moron.....there have been multiple interviews with NFL players talking about Brazil and how dangerous it is down there and how they don't feel safe walking the streets.
West coast teams should not have to fly 11+ hours to play a freaking game.
FYI the murder rate in Brazil is 4x higher than in the US so spare me the BS.

do us all a favor and don't respond

Oh, but I will respond. It is actually you who keeps dodging my questions.
Murder rates depend on the city – and I can tell you from experience that big cities in the U.S. can be just as dangerous as big cities in Brazil.

BUT STILL – even if you take Brazil out of the equation because it is supposedly “too dangerous” (as pathetic of an argument as that is), why don’t you want games in London or Ireland? You clearly stated you are against ANY international game.

So, what’s the excuse now? I’ll be waiting for a response, though I’m not expecting a clever one – since you’ve shown you’re simply not capable of it. Oh and spare me the stupid argument " it is too tiresome for the players " .

[ocram23]

just par for the course with your takes. you consistently show that you are a complete moron.....there have been multiple interviews with NFL players talking about Brazil and how dangerous it is down there and how they don't feel safe walking the streets.
West coast teams should not have to fly 11+ hours to play a freaking game.
FYI the murder rate in Brazil is 4x higher than in the US so spare me the BS.

do us all a favor and don't respond

Oh, but I will respond. It is actually you who keeps dodging my questions.
Murder rates depend on the city – and I can tell you from experience that big cities in the U.S. can be just as dangerous as big cities in Brazil.

BUT STILL – even if you take Brazil out of the equation because it is supposedly “too dangerous” (as pathetic of an argument as that is), why don’t you want games in London or Ireland? You clearly stated you are against ANY international game.

So, what’s the excuse now? I’ll be waiting for a response, though I’m not expecting a clever one – since you’ve shown you’re simply not capable of it. Oh and spare me the stupid argument " it is too tiresome for the players " .

let me rephrase what I am saying if you want to do international games then do it with the east coast teams..is that better??? west coast teams should not be flying 11+ hours to go play a game sorry

[Slickjack]

Personally speaking, I will not be watching the halftime show at the Super Bowl but rather overindulging in chicken wings or the like.

[brasilrams]

Oh, but I will respond. It is actually you who keeps dodging my questions.
Murder rates depend on the city – and I can tell you from experience that big cities in the U.S. can be just as dangerous as big cities in Brazil.

BUT STILL – even if you take Brazil out of the equation because it is supposedly “too dangerous” (as pathetic of an argument as that is), why don’t you want games in London or Ireland? You clearly stated you are against ANY international game.

So, what’s the excuse now? I’ll be waiting for a response, though I’m not expecting a clever one – since you’ve shown you’re simply not capable of it. Oh and spare me the stupid argument " it is too tiresome for the players " .

let me rephrase what I am saying if you want to do international games then do it with the east coast teams..is that better??? west coast teams should not be flying 11+ hours to go play a game sorry

I will disagree – and let’s just leave it at that. Every team should play international games to help expand the market worldwide and to give fans around the globe the chance to watch a game live in a stadium. I wouldn't worry about the players being too tired , they are 20-30 ish , genetic freaks who makes millions and millions and fly charter .They can handle a longer flight. I don’t have the stats in front of me, but I’m confident the injury rates for international games are no different than for games played in the US.