The RAMS Forum

Posted: **December 5th, 2025, 3:06 pm**

I will believe this over the Rams drafting a QB in round #1. The latter will not happen under McVay.

Posted: **December 5th, 2025, 5:32 pm**

I would take him based on his frock alone.

Posted: **December 5th, 2025, 5:43 pm**

: Screenshot_20251205-174225.png (1.66 MiB) Viewed 3452 times

Posted: **December 5th, 2025, 5:51 pm**

EastBayRamsFan wrote: ↑December 5th, 2025, 3:06 pm I will believe this over the Rams drafting a QB in round #1. The later will not happen under McVay.

Good point and I've said something similar. I really don't see McVay developing a guy from day one and he never has. I think it's a lot more likely he trades for another big name at QB who can thrive here. Not sure if it's Lawrence but it's likely to be a veteran. People always throw Joe Burrow's name out there but why would Cincinnati do that? I just hope it's not Kyler Murray because he sucks.

Posted: **December 5th, 2025, 7:34 pm**

Well, if we see these two in cabo hanging out ‘all coincidentally of course’… then……..

Posted: **December 5th, 2025, 8:12 pm**

Jacksnow wrote: ↑December 5th, 2025, 5:32 pm I would take him based on his frock alone.

Not that I would ever compliment another dude on his looks but man......Trevor has some nice locks

That's Hollywood hair there.

Posted: **December 6th, 2025, 2:07 am**

No thanks... the guy just doesn't have IT

Posted: **December 6th, 2025, 5:25 am**

Jacksnow wrote: ↑December 5th, 2025, 5:43 pm Screenshot_20251205-174225.png

Ah yes, my favorite lesbian QB. To me he's had a Jared Goff 'esq career so far. He has the tools. Im not sure why Duvall would even consider this, but if the price is good enough. Im in.

Posted: **December 6th, 2025, 7:25 am**

DVA_ram33 wrote: ↑December 6th, 2025, 2:07 am No thanks... the guy just doesn't have IT

I agree something off about this guy. I agree with most why would McVay want to develop a guy only reasons is the money savings but the downside outweighs the upside.

Posted: **December 6th, 2025, 8:23 am**

Link?

Posted: **December 6th, 2025, 8:47 am**

NorCal RF wrote: ↑December 6th, 2025, 8:23 amLink?

Links:

https://blackandteal.com/jaguars-trevor ... kbnxa0x2wf

https://www.theringer.com/2025/12/04/nf ... ch-manning

https://www.msn.com/en-us/sports/nfl/ke ... r-AA1RMNF2

Posted: **December 6th, 2025, 11:00 am**

There's no noise. Nowhere online does it say anything about the rams wabting Trevor Lawrence. Even a blind man can see that's not happening.

Posted: **December 6th, 2025, 11:04 am**

Baker Mayfield was toast... considered about washed up when we grabbed him (and NO ONE else wanted him).

Matt Stafford was overrated and washed many said (even in here when we nabbed him from the Lions)...

and I dont care what anyone says, McVay made Goff a complete Rock Star (until Goff hit the Super Bowl and crapped the bed).

McVay has a way to make QB's feel confident and get their mojo back... I think this could work, because I have watched Trevor for years and always thought he was on the cusp of being really good.

Lawrence is kind of like in the Justin Herbert category to me. Both great QB's, but I feel there is more potential. (And finally we are seeing more of this year w Herbert, because his new coach knows how to push the limits of potential)

Ill just say this, McVay can be the Quarterback whisperer... He demands excellence from his QB's... so to me, if we nab Trevor, I think we should trust Sean in seeing more than we have seen while he's been a Jag. Guy has incredible smarts, which is required to QB for the McVay offense. Also, has a phenomenal arm... So, I can see it.

Maybe Trevor's issue is that he just hasn't been w the right coach or team yet... hmmmm.

I am officially on the fence w this pic up. I would have to put this more in the 'Have to trust coach' area. (hope this isn't 'deflecting' on my part here again, Eastbay

)

Posted: **December 6th, 2025, 11:06 am**

FelixTheStonerCat wrote: ↑December 6th, 2025, 11:00 am Even a blind man can see that's not happening.

Posted: **December 6th, 2025, 11:17 am**

DelMar wrote: ↑December 6th, 2025, 11:04 am Baker Mayfield was toast... considered about washed up when we grabbed him (and NO ONE else wanted him).

Matt Stafford was overrated and washed many said (even in here when we nabbed him from the Lions)...

and I dont care what anyone says, McVay made Goff a complete Rock Star (until Goff hit the Super Bowl and crapped the bed).

McVay has a way to make QB's feel confident and get their mojo back... I think this could work, because I have watched Trevor for years and always thought he was on the cusp of being really good.

Lawrence is kind of like in the Justin Herbert category to me. Both great QB's, but I feel there is more potential. (And finally we are seeing more of this year w Herbert, because his new coach knows how to push the limits of potential)

Ill just say this, McVay can be the Quarterback whisperer... He demands excellence from his QB's... so to me, if we nab Trevor, I think we should trust Sean in seeing more than we have seen while he's been a Jag. Guy has incredible smarts, which is required to QB for the McVay offense. Also, has a phenomenal arm... So, I can see it.

Maybe Trevor's issue is that he just hasn't been w the right coach or team yet... hmmmm.

I am officially on the fence w this pic up. I would have to put this more in the 'Have to trust coach' area. (hope this isn't 'deflecting' on my part here again, Eastbay )

Solid DelMar-I agree with you in spades. McVay will work with a proven commodity rather than a rookie which is a roll of the dice.

Posted: **December 6th, 2025, 11:20 am**

FelixTheStonerCat wrote: ↑December 6th, 2025, 11:00 am There's no noise. Nowhere online does it say anything about the rams wabting Trevor Lawrence. Even a blind man can see that's not happening.

Another example of StonerBoy not reading the posts. NoCal ask for the link….I provide 3 different sources of noise and StonerBoy says nowhere on-line is there noise about this??????

Now I wonder if you can read or have ADHD

Posted: **December 6th, 2025, 11:55 am**

EastBayRamsFan wrote: ↑December 6th, 2025, 11:20 am
FelixTheStonerCat wrote: ↑December 6th, 2025, 11:00 am There's no noise. Nowhere online does it say anything about the rams wabting Trevor Lawrence. Even a blind man can see that's not happening.
Another example of StonerBoy not reading the posts. NoCal ask for the link….I provide 3 different sources of noise and StonerBoy says nowhere on-line is there noise about this??????

Now I wonder if you can read or have ADHD

Oh? So you gotta throw out name calling like an immature little bitch? No wonder most of you old assholes comment on here. Aint got no friends to hang out with so you bring your bitterness on here and take it out on others. Couldn't be me. Maybe its just a Cali asshole thing.

Posted: **December 6th, 2025, 11:56 am**

DelMar wrote: ↑December 6th, 2025, 11:06 am
FelixTheStonerCat wrote: ↑December 6th, 2025, 11:00 am Even a blind man can see that's not happening.

People wanna talk about me but want to bring up "some noise" from a source nobody gives a shit about.

Posted: **December 6th, 2025, 12:04 pm**

Id be all in favor of it. "If", there is any true "noise" to this story, its a given that MS has told headquarters that this is his last year. The downside for me would be they're still in that 50 mil QB range. Id love to have one on a rookie deal.

Ok Felix. You can ridicule my post in 3-2-1......

Posted: **December 6th, 2025, 12:07 pm**

Ramsfan08ny wrote: ↑December 6th, 2025, 12:04 pm Id be all in favor of it. "If", there is any true "noise" to this story, its a given that MS has told headquarters that this is his last year. The downside for me would be they're still in that 50 mil QB range. Id love to have one on a rookie deal.

Ok Felix. You can ridicule my post in 3-2-1......

I don't have an issue with you. Its the people who always gotta call me some dumb ass name. If Stafford wins the Bowl, going out on top will be one hell of a way to go. Trevor Lawrence is a QB I have no interest in, because he isn't that good.

Posted: **December 6th, 2025, 12:40 pm**

FelixTheStonerCat wrote: ↑December 6th, 2025, 11:55 am
EastBayRamsFan wrote: ↑December 6th, 2025, 11:20 am

Another example of StonerBoy not reading the posts. NoCal ask for the link….I provide 3 different sources of noise and StonerBoy says nowhere on-line is there noise about this??????

Now I wonder if you can read or have ADHD
Oh? So you gotta throw out name calling like an immature little bitch? No wonder most of you old assholes comment on here. Aint got no friends to hang out with so you bring your bitterness on here and take it out on others. Couldn't be me. Maybe its just a Cali asshole thing.

He provided the links. It’s up to one to then determine how much merit they give each article. But he provided the links………..

Posted: **December 6th, 2025, 12:48 pm**

FelixTheStonerCat wrote: ↑December 6th, 2025, 12:07 pm
Ramsfan08ny wrote: ↑December 6th, 2025, 12:04 pm Id be all in favor of it. "If", there is any true "noise" to this story, its a given that MS has told headquarters that this is his last year. The downside for me would be they're still in that 50 mil QB range. Id love to have one on a rookie deal.

Ok Felix. You can ridicule my post in 3-2-1......
I don't have an issue with you. Its the people who always gotta call me some dumb ass name. If Stafford wins the Bowl, going out on top will be one hell of a way to go. Trevor Lawrence is a QB I have no interest in, because he isn't that good.

Im wondering if TL's short comings have been him, or the sorry franchise he's been associated with since coming to the NFL. If the Rams were to trade for him, it means that SMcV blessed it and said he could win with him.

Posted: **December 6th, 2025, 1:16 pm**

I do not like QBs with accuracy issues. Are they fixable? Maybe. With that said I doubt Lawrence becomes a ram.

Posted: **December 6th, 2025, 1:34 pm**

NorCal RF wrote: ↑December 6th, 2025, 12:40 pm
FelixTheStonerCat wrote: ↑December 6th, 2025, 11:55 am

Oh? So you gotta throw out name calling like an immature little bitch? No wonder most of you old assholes comment on here. Aint got no friends to hang out with so you bring your bitterness on here and take it out on others. Couldn't be me. Maybe its just a Cali asshole thing.
He provided the links. It’s up to one to then determine how much merit they give each article. But he provided the links………..

I didn't read them. I don't read theringer like that.

Posted: **December 6th, 2025, 1:40 pm**

FelixTheStonerCat wrote: ↑December 6th, 2025, 11:55 am
EastBayRamsFan wrote: ↑December 6th, 2025, 11:20 am

Another example of StonerBoy not reading the posts. NoCal ask for the link….I provide 3 different sources of noise and StonerBoy says nowhere on-line is there noise about this??????

Now I wonder if you can read or have ADHD
Oh? So you gotta throw out name calling like an immature little bitch? No wonder most of you old assholes comment on here. Aint got no friends to hang out with so you bring your bitterness on here and take it out on others. Couldn't be me. Maybe its just a Cali asshole thing.

You should probably know that both Glendora and I are “old assholes”. I even manage to make it an artform

Posted: **December 6th, 2025, 1:41 pm**

how in hell can the Rams afford him? he has a massive contract so unless Jax is going to assume 50% then there is no chance is hell this is happening

Posted: **December 6th, 2025, 1:46 pm**

TheTustinRam wrote: ↑December 6th, 2025, 1:40 pm
FelixTheStonerCat wrote: ↑December 6th, 2025, 11:55 am

Oh? So you gotta throw out name calling like an immature little bitch? No wonder most of you old assholes comment on here. Aint got no friends to hang out with so you bring your bitterness on here and take it out on others. Couldn't be me. Maybe its just a Cali asshole thing.
You should probably know that both Glendora and I are “old assholes”. I even manage to make it an artform

Yall are loveable old assholes tho lol. I am going to keep things on track tho. I just don't see TL being a Ram, but if he does, I'll trust the decision. I just really can't see him fitting with this offense.

Posted: **December 6th, 2025, 2:02 pm**

No thanks.

Posted: **December 6th, 2025, 2:38 pm**

Yep, I'm still all on board with Mcvay finding a QB in the 26 draft who will be next in line.

Posted: **December 7th, 2025, 3:56 am**

I'm on record...I would welcomer this depending on the cost. This is not an exciting QB class in my view and prefer to address O-line and CB with the first couple of picks.

QB's can find new life in other systems, I think it is time for TL to get out of FLA and moving to the other side of the country and a new conference will do him wonders

The RAMS Forum

Some "noise" that Rams are pursuing Trevor Lawrence

Some "noise" that Rams are pursuing Trevor Lawrence

Re: Some "noise" that Rams are pursuing Trevor Lawrence

Re: Some "noise" that Rams are pursuing Trevor Lawrence

Re: Some "noise" that Rams are pursuing Trevor Lawrence

Re: Some "noise" that Rams are pursuing Trevor Lawrence

Re: Some "noise" that Rams are pursuing Trevor Lawrence

Re: Some "noise" that Rams are pursuing Trevor Lawrence

Re: Some "noise" that Rams are pursuing Trevor Lawrence

Re: Some "noise" that Rams are pursuing Trevor Lawrence

Re: Some "noise" that Rams are pursuing Trevor Lawrence

Re: Some "noise" that Rams are pursuing Trevor Lawrence

Re: Some "noise" that Rams are pursuing Trevor Lawrence

Re: Some "noise" that Rams are pursuing Trevor Lawrence

Re: Some "noise" that Rams are pursuing Trevor Lawrence

Re: Some "noise" that Rams are pursuing Trevor Lawrence

Re: Some "noise" that Rams are pursuing Trevor Lawrence

Re: Some "noise" that Rams are pursuing Trevor Lawrence

Re: Some "noise" that Rams are pursuing Trevor Lawrence

Re: Some "noise" that Rams are pursuing Trevor Lawrence

Re: Some "noise" that Rams are pursuing Trevor Lawrence

Re: Some "noise" that Rams are pursuing Trevor Lawrence

Re: Some "noise" that Rams are pursuing Trevor Lawrence

Re: Some "noise" that Rams are pursuing Trevor Lawrence

Re: Some "noise" that Rams are pursuing Trevor Lawrence

Re: Some "noise" that Rams are pursuing Trevor Lawrence

Re: Some "noise" that Rams are pursuing Trevor Lawrence

Re: Some "noise" that Rams are pursuing Trevor Lawrence

Re: Some "noise" that Rams are pursuing Trevor Lawrence

Re: Some "noise" that Rams are pursuing Trevor Lawrence

Re: Some "noise" that Rams are pursuing Trevor Lawrence