Page 1 of 1
Why the Rams kept 4 tight ends
Posted: September 9th, 2025, 4:03 pm
by Cornell29
Mcvay changed the offensive scheme yet again. Is this just a one game trend or is the 12 personnel going to be used 50 percent of the time throughout the year.
Re: Why the Rams kept 4 tight ends
Posted: September 9th, 2025, 4:28 pm
by DelMar
Rest of the year. It worked, and worked great. Having the TE more in play opens up just another threat for McVay and Staff. Higs, im a bit frustrated w though.
Re: Why the Rams kept 4 tight ends
Posted: September 9th, 2025, 4:30 pm
by EastBayRamsFan
However........the only two tight ends any of us noticed on the field Sunday was Parkinson-(unfortunately), and Davis Allen.
I still am asking the question why he kept 4 tight ends?
Re: Why the Rams kept 4 tight ends
Posted: September 9th, 2025, 4:32 pm
by DelMar
EastBayRamsFan wrote: ↑September 9th, 2025, 4:30 pm
However........the only two tight ends any of us noticed on the field Sunday was Parkinson-(unfortunately), and Davis Allen.
I still am asking the question why he kept 4 tight ends?
Rotation
Re: Why the Rams kept 4 tight ends
Posted: September 9th, 2025, 4:36 pm
by Cornell29
DelMar wrote: ↑September 9th, 2025, 4:32 pm
EastBayRamsFan wrote: ↑September 9th, 2025, 4:30 pm
However........the only two tight ends any of us noticed on the field Sunday was Parkinson-(unfortunately), and Davis Allen.
I still am asking the question why he kept 4 tight ends?
Rotation
Agreed
And depth
If you need two tight ends on the field for more than 50 percent of the plays, the Rams need 4 tight ends
Rams rotated 3 tight ends yesterday Higbee, Allen and Park. Ferguson is depth until he is ready.
Re: Why the Rams kept 4 tight ends
Posted: September 9th, 2025, 4:58 pm
by NorCal RF
Cornell29 wrote: ↑September 9th, 2025, 4:36 pm
DelMar wrote: ↑September 9th, 2025, 4:32 pm
Rotation
Agreed
And depth
If you need two tight ends on the field for more than 50 percent of the plays, the Rams need 4 tight ends
Rams rotated 3 tight ends yesterday Higbee, Allen and Park. Ferguson is depth until he is ready.
JMO Ferguson should not be depth and they need to go pedal to the metal in getting him ready. He has a skill set in the passing game that this team has not had at TE in a long time…………
Re: Why the Rams kept 4 tight ends
Posted: September 9th, 2025, 5:01 pm
by DelMar
NorCal RF wrote: ↑September 9th, 2025, 4:58 pm
Cornell29 wrote: ↑September 9th, 2025, 4:36 pm
Agreed
And depth
If you need two tight ends on the field for more than 50 percent of the plays, the Rams need 4 tight ends
Rams rotated 3 tight ends yesterday Higbee, Allen and Park. Ferguson is depth until he is ready.
JMO Ferguson should not be depth and they need to go pedal to the metal in getting him ready. He has a skill set in the passing game that this team has not had at TE in a long time…………
Absolutely agree on this... ESPECIALLY since w Higs gets hit w the injury bug so easily.
Re: Why the Rams kept 4 tight ends
Posted: September 9th, 2025, 5:19 pm
by STL Woody
NorCal RF wrote: ↑September 9th, 2025, 4:58 pm
Cornell29 wrote: ↑September 9th, 2025, 4:36 pm
Agreed
And depth
If you need two tight ends on the field for more than 50 percent of the plays, the Rams need 4 tight ends
Rams rotated 3 tight ends yesterday Higbee, Allen and Park. Ferguson is depth until he is ready.
JMO Ferguson should not be depth and they need to go pedal to the metal in getting him ready. He has a skill set in the passing game that this team has not had at TE in a long time…………
I totally agree, but I look forward to just when the league thinks they have the Rams figured out adding him as a new wrinkle/threat right before the playoffs and beyond. On two occasions Sunday I saw Tutu, smith, mumfield. What a 3rd package for teams to have to prepare for. And we all saw Smith. Everyone will be fresh at this rate
Re: Why the Rams kept 4 tight ends
Posted: September 9th, 2025, 5:49 pm
by Cornell29
NorCal RF wrote: ↑September 9th, 2025, 4:58 pm
Cornell29 wrote: ↑September 9th, 2025, 4:36 pm
Agreed
And depth
If you need two tight ends on the field for more than 50 percent of the plays, the Rams need 4 tight ends
Rams rotated 3 tight ends yesterday Higbee, Allen and Park. Ferguson is depth until he is ready.
JMO Ferguson should not be depth and they need to go pedal to the metal in getting him ready. He has a skill set in the passing game that this team has not had at TE in a long time…………
No argument from me, I would at least make him number 2. Mcvay and company dont think he is ready. He got injured over the summer and it set him back, I guess.
Re: Why the Rams kept 4 tight ends
Posted: September 10th, 2025, 7:23 am
by DVA_ram33
I don't think McVay thinks he is ready yet.. especially his blocking. We will see him soon enough.. This isn't the first time he has held back a rookie.
Re: Why the Rams kept 4 tight ends
Posted: September 10th, 2025, 7:49 am
by NorCal RF
duanevalle22 wrote: ↑September 10th, 2025, 7:30 am
The Ram TE's had a crappy game..... Two terrible holding calls and that ridiculous fumble. It would nice to have a consistent serviceable TE that doesn't get hurt all the time and doesn't makes bone head mistakes. Stafford needs a reliable TE, especially with our already depleted OL.
“ especially with our already depleted OL”
4 of the 5 OL starters are scheduled to start Sunday. How does that define depleted? You do pay attention to the rest of the league and their injuries? Never mind I already know you don’t……..
Re: Why the Rams kept 4 tight ends
Posted: September 10th, 2025, 8:32 am
by NorCal RF
duanevalle22 wrote: ↑September 10th, 2025, 7:55 am
No I don't have time to pay attention to other teams injuries. But since the Rams OL was ranked worst after week 1, that is a very big concern, especially when you have one of the slowest / fragile QB's in the league. Two starting OL's with sprained ankles is not a good thing.
Then I suggest you do………
Re: Why the Rams kept 4 tight ends
Posted: September 10th, 2025, 6:34 pm
by Claremontram
12 personnel is fine by me; whatever keeps Stafford upright and puts points on the board.