This should be Stafford’s last year, I’m good
Moderator: GlendoraRam
- Cornell29
- Hall of Fame Member

- Posts: 8655
- Joined: September 26th, 2016, 8:56 am
- Has thanked: 79 times
- Been thanked: 503 times
Re: This should be Stafford’s last year, I’m good
Bottom post of the previous page:
Two
They could go QB and OT in first round
Please Become a VIP Member to Remove Advertisment
- ocram23
- Hall of Fame Member

- Posts: 11051
- Joined: October 15th, 2019, 6:12 pm
- Has thanked: 123 times
- Been thanked: 315 times
Re: This should be Stafford’s last year, I’m good
let's just cross our fingers and hope ATL continues to lose. Rams need help at QB, OL and CB's....oh and LB
Please Login or Become a VIP Member to Remove Advertisment
- DelMar
- VIP Member

- Posts: 7085
- Joined: January 31st, 2023, 11:01 am
- Has thanked: 1049 times
- Been thanked: 644 times
Re: This should be Stafford’s last year, I’m good
Yep, and I have no problem using a first round pick on the next Jackie Slater/Orlando Pace (not that those guys grow on trees, but we sure can use a 1st to nab a OL is my point).
Hav's is aging. Avila is made of glass. Limmer, well thats obvious. I think it's pretty apparent we have some serious work to do this next offseason.
Ill also say this... I just wonder why McSnead just dont seem to ever respect the OL spot.
Pop quiz... since McVay took over in 2017. How many OL players have we drafted in the FIRST or SECOND rounds? (NOT a TE, but just G, C and T)...
Just one. and that player was Avila in round 2 in 2023 draft.
Bonus question: How many in the 3rd rounds? Just 3 (NoteDoom in '18, Evans in '19, Logan Bruss '22)
Point is, our first pic I hope is our next QB then our second 1st round pic, OL.
Please Login or Become a VIP Member to Remove Advertisment
Please Login or Become a VIP Member to Remove Advertisment
Please Login or Become a VIP Member to Remove Advertisment
- DVA_ram33
- Hall of Fame Member

- Posts: 755
- Joined: December 18th, 2024, 1:26 am
- Has thanked: 55 times
- Been thanked: 114 times
Re: This should be Stafford’s last year, I’m good
Rams have done amazing things with reclamations: think Warner, Bulger and Mayfield… why not Stetson
I stopped myself from putting Wentz on that list
Last edited by DVA_ram33 on September 24th, 2025, 7:49 am, edited 2 times in total.
Please Login or Become a VIP Member to Remove Advertisment
- Claremontram
- VIP Member

- Posts: 1425
- Joined: February 3rd, 2015, 11:57 am
- Has thanked: 219 times
- Been thanked: 137 times
Re: This should be Stafford’s last year, I’m good
A 1st round LT and a 2nd round Center would be game changing.
Please Login or Become a VIP Member to Remove Advertisment
- brasilrams
- VIP Member

- Posts: 5676
- Joined: January 6th, 2018, 5:29 pm
- Has thanked: 525 times
- Been thanked: 191 times
Re: This should be Stafford’s last year, I’m good
Stafford Solid but Shaky: Missed Throws Haunt Red-Zone Woes
Through two games, Matthew Stafford had been playing well, but Sunday’s performance was a step back—19-of-33 for 196 yards, two touchdowns, and one interception. He bookended the game with highlight-reel throws, including a 44-yard strike to Davante Adams in the first quarter and a 10-yard score to Kyren Williams early in the third to push the lead to 26-7. Yet, in a contest where the Rams needed vintage Stafford, he faltered on routine tosses that could’ve sealed the deal.
In the red zone, Stafford overthrew a wide-open Adams on third down, settling for a field goal instead of seven. Late in the first half, he badly missed Puka Nacua streaking free down the sideline—another field goal ensued. And on the drive before a holding call on center Coleman Shelton nullified a touchdown (putting the Rams up 17-7), Stafford sailed a slant over Adams’ head. These miscues fit a damning pattern in McVay-era losses to elite teams: the Rams go cold inside the 20.
Consider the evidence: In the 2023 playoff loss to Detroit, L.A. was 0-for-3 in the red zone while the Lions converted 3-for-3. Last year’s Week 1 defeat to the Lions? 2-for-5. The 2023 playoff heartbreaker to Philadelphia? Again, 2-for-5. Sunday? A dismal 2-for-5, despite the Shelton penalty gifting them extra life. McVay leaned on analytics with conservative calls, but the offense must execute better. The gap was stark: Rams settled for three while the Eagles punched in touchdowns, turning potential 28 points into 24 and costing four crucial scores.
from :https://www.theramsnews.com/rams-blew-a-19-point-lead/
Through two games, Matthew Stafford had been playing well, but Sunday’s performance was a step back—19-of-33 for 196 yards, two touchdowns, and one interception. He bookended the game with highlight-reel throws, including a 44-yard strike to Davante Adams in the first quarter and a 10-yard score to Kyren Williams early in the third to push the lead to 26-7. Yet, in a contest where the Rams needed vintage Stafford, he faltered on routine tosses that could’ve sealed the deal.
In the red zone, Stafford overthrew a wide-open Adams on third down, settling for a field goal instead of seven. Late in the first half, he badly missed Puka Nacua streaking free down the sideline—another field goal ensued. And on the drive before a holding call on center Coleman Shelton nullified a touchdown (putting the Rams up 17-7), Stafford sailed a slant over Adams’ head. These miscues fit a damning pattern in McVay-era losses to elite teams: the Rams go cold inside the 20.
Consider the evidence: In the 2023 playoff loss to Detroit, L.A. was 0-for-3 in the red zone while the Lions converted 3-for-3. Last year’s Week 1 defeat to the Lions? 2-for-5. The 2023 playoff heartbreaker to Philadelphia? Again, 2-for-5. Sunday? A dismal 2-for-5, despite the Shelton penalty gifting them extra life. McVay leaned on analytics with conservative calls, but the offense must execute better. The gap was stark: Rams settled for three while the Eagles punched in touchdowns, turning potential 28 points into 24 and costing four crucial scores.
from :https://www.theramsnews.com/rams-blew-a-19-point-lead/
Please Login or Become a VIP Member to Remove Advertisment
- DelMar
- VIP Member

- Posts: 7085
- Joined: January 31st, 2023, 11:01 am
- Has thanked: 1049 times
- Been thanked: 644 times
Re: This should be Stafford’s last year, I’m good
Rams have done amazing things? No, the coaches and players in those specific times have done amazing things. Rams have not done anything.
There have been so many Rams teams (coaches and management) it changes w every coach.
McVay, yes... turned Bakers football career. But it stops there. Bulger and Warner, different era, different coaches, shoot... different states.
Please Login or Become a VIP Member to Remove Advertisment
- DVA_ram33
- Hall of Fame Member

- Posts: 755
- Joined: December 18th, 2024, 1:26 am
- Has thanked: 55 times
- Been thanked: 114 times
Re: This should be Stafford’s last year, I’m good
I think you just confirmed that its the Rams as its been different coaches, periods and same results. Either way, we have a good history of this and not such a great history of drafting QBs.. maybe we roll with this and give Stetson a shot (although i think he will get his shot next year at some point)DelMar wrote: ↑September 25th, 2025, 11:58 am
Rams have done amazing things? No, the coaches and players in those specific times have done amazing things. Rams have not done anything.
There have been so many Rams teams (coaches and management) it changes w every coach.
McVay, yes... turned Bakers football career. But it stops there. Bulger and Warner, different era, different coaches, shoot... different states.
Please Login or Become a VIP Member to Remove Advertisment
- DelMar
- VIP Member

- Posts: 7085
- Joined: January 31st, 2023, 11:01 am
- Has thanked: 1049 times
- Been thanked: 644 times
Re: This should be Stafford’s last year, I’m good
Well then every other team could say the same thing as well. We’ve also had more of our fair share of the awful QB’s that also, well, stayed awful.DVA_ram33 wrote: ↑September 26th, 2025, 2:27 amI think you just confirmed that its the Rams as its been different coaches, periods and same results. Either way, we have a good history of this and not such a great history of drafting QBs.. maybe we roll with this and give Stetson a shot (although i think he will get his shot next year at some point)DelMar wrote: ↑September 25th, 2025, 11:58 am
Rams have done amazing things? No, the coaches and players in those specific times have done amazing things. Rams have not done anything.
There have been so many Rams teams (coaches and management) it changes w every coach.
McVay, yes... turned Bakers football career. But it stops there. Bulger and Warner, different era, different coaches, shoot... different states.
Point being, Stetson is a well priced backup. If this ever changes, please feel free to save this post and throw it in my face.
Please Login or Become a VIP Member to Remove Advertisment
- DVA_ram33
- Hall of Fame Member

- Posts: 755
- Joined: December 18th, 2024, 1:26 am
- Has thanked: 55 times
- Been thanked: 114 times
Re: This should be Stafford’s last year, I’m good
I don't do that!DelMar wrote: ↑September 26th, 2025, 6:02 amWell then every other team could say the same thing as well. We’ve also had more of our fair share of the awful QB’s that also, well, stayed awful.DVA_ram33 wrote: ↑September 26th, 2025, 2:27 am
I think you just confirmed that its the Rams as its been different coaches, periods and same results. Either way, we have a good history of this and not such a great history of drafting QBs.. maybe we roll with this and give Stetson a shot (although i think he will get his shot next year at some point)
Point being, Stetson is a well priced backup. If this ever changes, please feel free to save this post and throw it in my face.
There is something about him that I really like. He is incredible fighter and has been through so much. A bit like Mayfield. I wouldn't be surprised if he somehow gets in a game and everything changes.
The other thing is that teams rush young QBs into action and inevitably most of them fail and never get their confidence back. Stetson has been sitting back there watching and observing.
Looking at the current crop of College QBs, there's not one that I would like the Rams to invest a first round pick on (let alone 2) ofcourse that can change through the year.
Please Login or Become a VIP Member to Remove Advertisment
- Ramsfan08ny
- VIP Member

- Posts: 2408
- Joined: February 9th, 2016, 1:30 pm
- Has thanked: 10 times
- Been thanked: 167 times
Re: This should be Stafford’s last year, I’m good
Well, sort of. If Jimmy G was going to be the starter from day one this year hes not getting paid 2 mil. Still saving money because it would have been more along the lines of 15-20, but certainly not 2 mil.Jacksnow wrote: ↑September 22nd, 2025, 7:53 pmThis!SoCalRam78 wrote: ↑September 21st, 2025, 2:42 pm He’s a 50 mil dollar cap hit. I think the Rams shitty red zone play is a lot on him. He really wasn’t good last year for large portions of season. He did well in the playoffs. He was totally pedestrian today and had good RB play and decent protection. Is Jimmy G at a 2 mil cap hit that different? Sure. Prob still
Lose but you’d have a to Of money to round out that roster.
Please Login or Become a VIP Member to Remove Advertisment
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: brasilrams, CierraRam, Cornell29, Jacksnow, MichiganRam, ocram23 and 27 guests
