Page 2 of 2

Re: This wasnt a fluke win

Posted: September 9th, 2025, 2:47 pm
by RonMac

Bottom post of the previous page:

Some valid points here on the Rams lack of speed and explosion on O - RB and run game as used by McVay does not reflect any Deep Speed / Home Run style. I have never been a true fan of K Williams or TuTu Atwell and McVay remains riveted to both in his O.while we are at it : why was RB T Hunter not deemed good enuff to help this O with his skill set ? Not even a PS player ?

Re: This wasnt a fluke win

Posted: September 9th, 2025, 4:08 pm
by Cornell29
RonMac wrote: September 9th, 2025, 2:47 pm Some valid points here on the Rams lack of speed and explosion on O - RB and run game as used by McVay does not reflect any Deep Speed / Home Run style. I have never been a true fan of K Williams or TuTu Atwell and McVay remains riveted to both in his O.while we are at it : why was RB T Hunter not deemed good enuff to help this O with his skill set ? Not even a PS player ?
TuTu didn't play much, Rams OL struggled to block, so running deep routes wouldn't be the best strategy.

T Hunter was inactive and they did bring up a PS rb Cody.

More likely Hunter will be active this week but I don't expect him to get any plays with a healthy KW and Blake in front of him.

Re: This wasnt a fluke win

Posted: September 10th, 2025, 4:06 pm
by malibu
I think the Rams looked strong overall to me. 1st quarter play calling seemed off too many passes. OL was ok not bad not great. Running game hampered to a degree from OL. Stafford, WRs, defense overall looked great. Can't have those mistakes Higby, Parkinson, Reeder my 3 least favorite Rams btw